Re: 32 bit vista can't address more than 3.1-3.5 GB RAM
- From: Snit <CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 14:02:08 -0700
"Jesper" <spambuster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
1i9jjbb.8b3wm1hxq73uN%spambuster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 12/22/07 1:22 PM:
Of a modern OS, Vista is surprisingly oldfashioned: 32 bit vista fails
to access more than 3.1-3.5 GB RAM. M$ wants people to buy their
expensive server solutions to run apps requirering more than approx 3.1
GB of RAM. Furthermore 64 bit vista is unable to run 32 bit apps. In
Leopard the support is seemless!
I got 4 GB of RAM for my Mac and just took it for granted that modern OSs
would accept it with no problem. Amazing.
--
One who makes no mistakes, never makes anything.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 32 bit vista can't address more than 3.1-3.5 GB RAM
- From: Ilgaz Öcal
- Re: 32 bit vista can't address more than 3.1-3.5 GB RAM
- References:
- 32 bit vista can't address more than 3.1-3.5 GB RAM
- From: Jesper
- 32 bit vista can't address more than 3.1-3.5 GB RAM
- Prev by Date: Re: Are Macs less secure than PCs?
- Next by Date: Re: Wintards say Vista & XP Security is better than OS X while millions of bots spam the planet
- Previous by thread: 32 bit vista can't address more than 3.1-3.5 GB RAM
- Next by thread: Re: 32 bit vista can't address more than 3.1-3.5 GB RAM
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
