Re: Mac are not more expensive?



David Fritzinger wrote:
In article <4738db2d$0$20589$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Steve de Mena <steven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Jay wrote:
On Nov 11, 3:45 pm, Tommy <tom_e...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Task - run Office, Web browser, photo editing and organization, etc.

Options ( the ! is the separator of the 2 brands, Apple and Gateway):

Intel® 2x2.4 GHZ ! AMD 2x1.9 GHz

17" Widescreen TFT-LCD (1680 x 1050) ! 17" WXGA+ with BrightView (1440
x 900)
Price $2,799.99 ! $1,099.99
I'm confused. Are you speccing a Mac Pro with a separate Cinema
Display?

Because for Office, web browsing, and photo editing you could get a
20" iMac for $1200.

I think he meant $1,799 for the iMac with 2.4Ghz.

Actually, for the 20"/2.4 GHz iMac, the price is $1499 (USD). If you want the 24" model, with the same processor, the price is $1799 (USD).


That's right. I was looking at the wrong one.

Steve
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: AMD Dual Core CPUs
    ... To get an X2 at 2.4 GHz, you have to step up to> the 4200+, which is almost double the price. ... > I'm still going to go with an AMD 64, but I think that I'll stick to> the single core. ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: Mac are not more expensive?
    ... is the separator of the 2 brands, Apple and Gateway): ... AMD 2x1.9 GHz ... I think he meant $1,799 for the iMac with 2.4Ghz. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Good to see the updates
    ... price point. ... It looks like a minor speed bump (1.8 to 2 GHz) ... the tooth and six years old) but I can't justify another Pro. ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: AMD Sempron 3000+ speed
    ... but when I came to do video processing it took just ... AMD has been using the 'Intel equivalent' rating for quite some time now. ... The only 3 GHz AMD CPUs are the BRAND NEW Socket 940 Opteron x56 series! ...
    (alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt)
  • Re: AMD, or Intel?
    ... the 3.0 GHz Phenom II 940 performs about the same ... as the 2.66 GHz Intel Core2 Quad Q9400. ... the AMD is a marginally better value. ... renderings - but it would cost $609 or 45.6% more. ...
    (comp.cad.solidworks)