Re: America's last hope.....




On 10/11/07 8:00 AM, in article C35A349C.986B5%CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"Snit" <CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Tim Adams" <teadams$2$0$0$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
teadams$2$0$0$3-2BA7AB.17514309112007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on
11/9/07 3:51 PM:

In article <C35A5FF3.3F9F%wally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wally
<wally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On 9/11/07 9:05 AM, in article C358F23C.983FC%CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"Snit" <CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Tim Adams" <teadams$2$0$0$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
teadams$2$0$0$3-F1A93E.18550008112007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on
11/8/07 4:55 PM:

You sure play a bunch of absurd games.

So to you, pointing out reality is merely playing 'absurd games'.

Nope, not all all.

More proof that snit has a major reading/writing comprehension problem.

Ah, your lies are "proof" about me. LOL! How do you figure [hint: you
don't - you are simply lying!]

But the absurd games Wally played - and you tried but gave no reason to
believe you were bright enough to play will - we clearly stupid. To be
specific: you both lied and pretended that my views on abortion (which are
and have been to be anti-abortion and pro-choice) were somehow inconsistent
or changing or otherwise not reasonable views to hold and to have held.

And I did that by *not* commenting specifically on those two elements that
allegedly form your views on abortion Snit?

I have quoted the two statements that prove your contradictory stance on
abortion Snit and not one of them related to these two elements that you
mention! And you know that therefore you are most certainly lying!
For someone such as you considering your embarrassment I expected nothing
else of you!

Wally, I had also pointed out how his claim of being 'anti-abortion and
pro-choice' was merely his red herring as he attempted to change the topic
away
from the two statements he had made. Said statement having absolutely NOTHING
to
do with is 'anti-abortion and pro-choice' claim. As is typical with snit, he
snipped and ran away.


When that game was shown to be stupid Wally sank to making dishonest
accusations of racism - accusations you echoed but then failed to respond
to
a request to quote any comment of mine you think supports the accusation of
yours.

What would that have served? You are not honest enough to acknowledge the
racist nature of your comment Snit no matter who shows it to you!

In other words, Tim, you lied in a public forum about someone being racist.
That is despicable.

I assure you Tim can read, and what's more he can understand what he reads,
having seen your comment he obviously... as most reasonable people would
...concluded that your remark was racist in nature, whether he chose to
quote you or not is immaterial to the fact that you posted racist remarks in
a "public forum", having made you aware of the remark in question Snit I
have no doubt that Tim finds it offensive to reproduce such a comment when
there is no good reason to!

Why? And why do you resort to
dishonest accusations of racism when your games are showed to be as
meaningless as they are? Why don't you act in a more reasonable way? I
really would like to know - though I doubt you are willing and able to
provide a reasonable answer.



In regards to abortion I am anti-abortion and pro-choice. That is, really,
about all I *have* said on the topic.

Except of course for...

"I ... would never support my wife having an abortion..."-Snit

And

" I simply do not agree with the decision to abort in anything but the most
extreme of cases"-Snit

ROTFLMAO!

You, Wally, and Carroll all freaked out over it and, when you failed to be
able to make a single cogent point (even as a group) Wally sank to absurd
lies about racism...

"There is absolutely nothing dishonest about calling a racist...'a racist',
and Snit considering the comment that you made that is what you are!"-Wally

a lie you quickly jumped on (though ran when I asked
you to support your BS accusation).

The funny this is: I bet you three think you are being clever. Really.

There is nothing "clever" about being able to read two contradictory
statements on the same subject from the same person ...in this case you...
And then noting the ....contradiction! It's simply something most people are
able to do easily!

The fact that you even suggest that some level of cleverness must have been
responsible is far more a reflection of your inabilities than it is on
anyone else's abilities!

.