Re: Apple Blameless in bricking affair?
- From: nospamatall <nospamatall@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 22:18:16 +0100
Jim wrote:
In article <nqvvg3lh4pvqisl8j6sb9sna7sm481000s@xxxxxxx>,<snip>
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sorry, but you've yet to show that "numerous" non-hacked iPhones wereIf you're not going to read the newspaper don't expect me to read it
hit...
to you.
IOW, you have NOTHING to back up the assertion YOU BROUGHT UP.
Remember klyde, you made the allegation that non-hacked iPhones were
bricked. You and you alone.
Provide your source, if you can.
No doubt he has a source, but if it is like any of those I saw, it was
just someone _claiming_ not to have hacked it. Something I would do if I
was stupid enough to be caught out despite the numerous warnings. Even
if a few did get disabled, they are under warranty.
All these stories lack depth, all can be seen through easily, but that
is the nature of FUD.
Andy
.
- References:
- Apple Blameless in bricking affair?
- From: Jim
- Re: Apple Blameless in bricking affair?
- From: Mayor of R'lyeh
- Re: Apple Blameless in bricking affair?
- From: Alan Baker
- Re: Apple Blameless in bricking affair?
- From: Mayor of R'lyeh
- Re: Apple Blameless in bricking affair?
- From: Alan Baker
- Re: Apple Blameless in bricking affair?
- From: Mayor of R'lyeh
- Re: Apple Blameless in bricking affair?
- From: Jim
- Apple Blameless in bricking affair?
- Prev by Date: Re: IE problems on Mac
- Next by Date: Re: Linux Gets A Leg Up
- Previous by thread: Re: Apple Blameless in bricking affair?
- Next by thread: Re: Apple Blameless in bricking affair?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|