Re: Maccies resort to their typical dishonesty [was Re: You wanted an example of a price drop...]

"Steve Carroll" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
noone-0235C4.13570412092007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 9/12/07 12:57 PM:

Edwin:
What's "uninformed" about that?

Carroll:
What's informed about it? He provided nothing in the way
of substance... he didn't inform anyone about anything...

I disagree that "uninformed" means "he didn't inform anyone about
anything" even if you say I "can't possibly disagree". You are, again,
wrong.

OK... then what do you think Donald conveyed?

I do not believe Donald has said a single word about your comments quoted
above, Steve. If you want to know you should ask him... but I will for
you:

Donald, do you believe "uninformed" means what Steve indicated he thought
it did in the quote above?

Why are you asking Donald that for me?

I truly believe you really cannot figure it out - even given that I explain
exactly why in the text you reply to. Please, Steve, try to understand what
you read - it makes conversations in a written medium work so much better.
:)

Nothing to figured out... well, maybe for you there is;)

What a splendid example of projection you just posted, Steve.

To get back to your side issue, though, you asked about Donald's views in
regards to your mistaken comments. I told you I would not speak for him and
then asked him, for you, what his views are. He has not answered. I doubt
he is reading this thread. If you really want to know what Donald thinks
about you comment I quote, above, why don't you ask *him*?

To get back to the actual topic I first commented on that you have failed to
give an honest response to, the word "uninformed" does *not* mean "he didn't
inform anyone about anything" as you clearly indicate in the relevant
quotes, still listed above at the top of this post.


--
Picture of a tuna soda: http://snipurl.com/f351
Feel free to ask for the recipe.



.

Relevant Pages