Re: Maccies resort to their typical dishonesty [was Re: You wanted an example of a price drop...]

In article <C30D688D.90719%CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Snit <CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Steve Carroll" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
noone-4F8E2B.08041612092007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 9/12/07 7:04 AM:

Edwin:
What's "uninformed" about that?

Carroll:
What's informed about it? He provided nothing in the way
of substance... he didn't inform anyone about anything...

I disagree that "uninformed" means "he didn't inform anyone about
anything"
even if you say I "can't possibly disagree". You are, again, wrong.

OK... then what do you think Donald conveyed?

I do not believe Donald has said a single word about your comments quoted
above, Steve. If you want to know you should ask him... but I will for
you:

Donald, do you believe "uninformed" means what Steve indicated he thought
it
did in the quote above?

Why are you asking Donald that for me?

I truly believe you really cannot figure it out


Nothing to figured out... well, maybe for you there is;) Take a crack at it...

1 - I said that Donald had an uninformed attitude:

"And uninformed attitudes like this"

--
[Note: If you need a definition (and are able to comprehend what you read;),
this is the way I was using the word "attitude":

at?ti?tude (t-td, -tyd)
n.

2. A manner of acting.]
--

2 -Donald made statements regarding Mac programs... statements that contained no
support at all:

"I surely hope someone takes you up on learning to write OS X programs,
since so few are able to create useful OS X programs. I say this because
there is such a paucity of good programs for the Mac, which I attribute to
the paucity of Macintosh developers, as well as Apple developers' long
tradition of refusing to give their customers those features they ask for".

3 - I commented that Donald's attitude or "manner of acting" while making such
statements was "uninformed" due to the fact that he provided no support. Edwin
then asked me what you quoted above - "What's "uninformed" about that?" ("that"
being Donald's attitude or "manner of acting"). Edwin obviously asked because
he wanted to know why I said Donald's attitude or "manner of acting" appeared to
be "uninformed" to me. I replied with what you quoted above - " What's informed
about it?" (the "it" being Donald's attitude or "manner of acting". I then
correctly pointed out that Donald's attitude or "manner of acting" had him
making statements and not showing any support for them, which is why I continued
with: "He provided nothing in the way of substance".

Fact: Donald provided no support for his statements.

I then followed up with: "... he didn't inform anyone about anything..."

Which was a true statement and completely relevant to the statement I made
regarding Donald's attitude or "manner of acting".... but, more to the point,
it answered the question Edwin asked about "that" (again... "that" being
Donald's attitude or "manner of acting").

I can give you language lessons whenever you need them, Snit... don't be ashamed
to ask me;)

Bonus question: Is an uninformed opinion a 'person' or a "who"? LOL!

--
"None of you can be honest... you are all pathetic." - Snit
"I do not KF people" - Snit
"Not only do I lie about what others are claiming,
I show evidence from the records".-Snit
"You should take one of my IT classes some day." - Snit
"People can *not* make their own ring tones without hacks or work-arounds".-Snit
.

Relevant Pages