Re: Maccies resort to their typical dishonesty [was Re: You wanted an example of a price drop...]

"Steve Carroll" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
noone-3CE81B.22152311092007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 9/11/07 9:15 PM:

In article <C30CAB22.90533%CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Snit <CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Steve Carroll" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
noone-66EA54.18154711092007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 9/11/07 5:15 PM:

Well, then, I disagree with what you said. I do not think "Uninformed"
means "he didn't inform anyone about anything".

As I didn't say that you can't possibly disagree.

Edwin:
What's "uninformed" about that?

Carroll:
What's informed about it? He provided nothing in the way
of substance... he didn't inform anyone about anything...

I disagree that "uninformed" means "he didn't inform anyone about anything"
even if you say I "can't possibly disagree". You are, again, wrong.

OK... then what do you think Donald conveyed?

I do not believe Donald has said a single word about your comments quoted
above, Steve. If you want to know you should ask him... but I will for you:

Donald, do you believe "uninformed" means what Steve indicated he thought it
did in the quote above?


--
Never stand between a dog and the hydrant. - John Peers

.

Relevant Pages