Re: Colorado Nutjob Back In Action!

"Steve Carroll" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
noone-677F26.08521824082007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 8/24/07 7:52 AM:

In article <C2F4322F.8D5EF%CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Snit <CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Steve Carroll" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
noone-5C16EF.21493023082007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 8/23/07 8:49 PM:

You sure make a lot of accusations, Steve.

In the end I merely offered *one* possible explanation for what others
noted
about your posting

One poster is not "others". That the poster in question was shown to be
wrong
in his line of thinking didn't help your original delusion.

and the posting of another with an IP from your neck of the woods - and
made
it very clear I was not accusing you of anything... who knows, you and the
other person / account from your neck of the woods could have no
relationship
at all. Is that what you are saying? If so I have seen no direct
evidence
in this thread to say otherwise.

You have seen no evidence that points to anything at all... one way or the
other. See how reality works YET?

I asked you a direct question and you did not answer it. Again:

you and the other person / account from your neck of
the woods could have no relationship at all. Is that
what you are saying?

You demand John explain things about things outside of CSMA - and yet you
will not do the favor of answering that question.

I 'demanded' it in the same way that you and John 'demanded' from me regarding
your unsupported csma moderator accusation (as if it even matters who the
identity of the moderator is). My point is that there is more and stronger
"actual" evidence that John vandalized Wikipedia than there is that I posted
as the moderator. Naturally, you want to gloss over all this... so you really
should be 'bowing out' now so as to keep yourself "honest and honorable". I'm
trying to help you live up to your contract... I suggest you heed my warning
that you are going out of bounds again.

You went off topic and did not answer the question.

you and the other person / account from your neck of
the woods could have no relationship at all. Is that
what you are saying?

Will you answer it now?


--
Computers are incredibly fast, accurate, and stupid: humans are incredibly
slow, inaccurate and brilliant; together they are powerful beyond
imagination. --Albert Einstein

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Colorado Nutjob Back In Action!
    ... Snit wrote: ... You have seen no evidence that points to anything at all... ... I 'demanded' it in the same way that you and John 'demanded' from me regarding ... identity of the moderator is). ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Where is Mcnameless?
    ... I was left wondering where John is. ... How about the fact that someone cancels my posts, ... moderator. ... Evidence and motive? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Colorado Nutjob Back In Action!
    ... Snit wrote: ... You have seen no evidence that points to anything at all... ... You demand John explain things about things outside of CSMA - and yet you ... identity of the moderator is). ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: All Evidence is Subjective...
    ... Polycarp knew the Apostle John, ... And you accept the narrative about Jesus because no ancient author disputes ... out the Apostolic Churches. ... What I am doing is giving evidence and so far ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
    ... Harshman would not support Darwinian evolution if it supported ... If the evidence supported theism, ... No one can go back and undo Darwin in order to find ... Yes, you are right John, what I said is backwards from the ...
    (talk.origins)