Re: John, formerly Winman, vandalizes Wikipedia
- From: Tim Adams <teadams$2$0$0$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:27:33 -0400
In article <Qe6dnWKR5JHlvVPbnZ2dnUVZ_qy3nZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"John" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Tim Adams" <teadams$2$0$0$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:teadams$2$0$0$3-74D70C.19300323082007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <3PGdnbkbBJesUVDbnZ2dnUVZ_sOrnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"John" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Elizabot v2.0.3" <Elizabot2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:13cri6eeqo2codb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Snit wrote:
"John" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
13creajg1u5ma5b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
on 8/23/07 9:43 AM:
"Elizabot v2.0.3" <Elizabot2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageI note she talked about sexual innuendos about her *private* life.
news:13cratl515p9oa0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Steve Carroll wrote:
In article <OrCdnRcNNYlxilDbnZ2dnUVZ_sOrnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,LMAO! Google shows that John was using that IP address on April 27,
"John" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Elizabot v2.0.3" <Elizabot2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageGee, did someone 'break into your house', John?
news:13cq54kngb1142e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
John's IP address: 75.84.159.90Its not me Lizzie!!
I googled it and got a hit.
Look at this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:75.84.159.90
"Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia. Your
edits
appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like
to
experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank
you.
OCNative 02:22, 27 April 2007 (UTC)"
Jeez, get a life, man. What the hell is wrong with you?
2007.
All he can do is deny it and make sexual innuendos about my private
life.
I use a cable modem with roadrunner and DO NOT have a fixed IP
address.
One,
I
see nothing of the kind in the material quoted... though maybe things
have
been snipped. I will say it is odd she talked about her *private*
life
in
this context... if she is hinting about her *public* or *business*
life I
do
not want to know... but it sure is odd wording. Maybe she just worded
it
poorly...
Actually, Steve had the decency to trim John's innuendo from the post
he
responded to. John made the innuendo on at least 3 occasions.
She started it by trolling me and Oxford yesterday.
Actually, it was you 'john the troll' that started it all yesterday, as
the
google record clearly shows. She pointed out a quote by Oxford and you
jumped in
with your OT comments. Then you made similar trolling OT remarks in a
couple of
other threads that she had posted.
Wrong you lying Dumbass!! Go back and read carefully where she
specifically mentioned my name. Right AFTER that post I told her what her
problem appeared to be.
Specifically mentioning you name wasn't trolling you john, unless you consider
pointing out fact as trolling.
--
regarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- OT: John, formerly Winman, vandalizes Wikipedia
- From: Elizabot v2.0.3
- Re: John, formerly Winman, vandalizes Wikipedia
- From: John
- Re: John, formerly Winman, vandalizes Wikipedia
- From: Steve Carroll
- Re: John, formerly Winman, vandalizes Wikipedia
- From: Elizabot v2.0.3
- Re: John, formerly Winman, vandalizes Wikipedia
- From: John
- Re: John, formerly Winman, vandalizes Wikipedia
- From: Snit
- Re: John, formerly Winman, vandalizes Wikipedia
- From: Elizabot v2.0.3
- Re: John, formerly Winman, vandalizes Wikipedia
- From: John
- Re: John, formerly Winman, vandalizes Wikipedia
- From: Tim Adams
- Re: John, formerly Winman, vandalizes Wikipedia
- From: John
- OT: John, formerly Winman, vandalizes Wikipedia
- Prev by Date: OT: cool little Flash I ran into...
- Next by Date: Getting the Official AT&T text requesting Paperless Billing
- Previous by thread: Re: John, formerly Winman, vandalizes Wikipedia
- Next by thread: Re: John, formerly Winman, vandalizes Wikipedia
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|