Re: Sandman... going to have to object to this...
- From: Snit <CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:45:43 -0700
"John" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
vPidnQNG36gz4jLbnZ2dnUVZ_q6hnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx on 7/31/07 11:29 AM:
If he does not make his BS a bit more entertaining I may very well do so
"Steve Carroll" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:noone-D316AB.10494831072007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Written by ChrisV...
"Sheesh. I clean-out the kill-file, and up pops Steve Carroll, the
worst troll-feeder since Kier.
It's people like you, Carroll, who are to blame for the success of
*** trolls like ***".
This clearly says I am a "troll feeder"... not a troll. If anything, this
should
have been a score against Snit as he is the person called a troll here.
ANYBODY who TAKES THE TIME to CAREFULLY read KNOWS you are the troll Steve.
Just look at the meltdown you suffered on this group a few months ago when
Snit ignored you!!!
again... he has sunk to mostly just fabricating stories about me that are so
of the wall no reasonable person would believe him... such as when he
dishonestly claimed to have taught me things as about as obvious as 2+2=4.
--
? Pros aren't beginners in their field (though there are new pros)
? Similarly configured Macs and Win machines tend to cost roughly the same
? Some people do use the term "screen name" in relation to IRC
.
- References:
- Sandman... going to have to object to this...
- From: Steve Carroll
- Re: Sandman... going to have to object to this...
- From: John
- Sandman... going to have to object to this...
- Prev by Date: Re: Why I admire Gates more than Jobs
- Next by Date: Re: The Wintard Preoccupation with Price and Marketshare
- Previous by thread: Re: Sandman... going to have to object to this...
- Index(es):