Re: iPod vs Zune in blind sound quality test
- From: Snit <CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 07:44:38 -0700
"Craig Koller" <cwkollertwo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
cwkollertwo-5FAA71.04511131052007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 5/31/07 4:51 AM:
In article <C2838094.82568%CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Snit <CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Super Spinner" <Pepe.Smythe@xxxxxxxxx> stated in post
1180577466.004055.228670@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 5/30/07 7:11 PM:
CNET Crave held an iPod vs Zune blind sound quality test, ala theThey are non-standard head phones... wonder if that has any effect?
"Pepsi Challenge" of the 70's and 80's.
Check it out.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=KmSzRV7ET94
Six people? And the first listener said "definitely this one" and it was
the iPod... And CNET brands 4 to 2 a "landslide victory".
Wow. I'd expect that from Joe Blow blogger but CNET? C'mon ... pretty
shoddy.
Yeah, when *one* person can change a tie to a "landslide" there is something
wrong. :)
--
? A partial subset is not synonymous with the whole
? A person's actions speak more about him than what others say
? Apple doesn't provide as many options as the rest of the PC industry
.
- References:
- iPod vs Zune in blind sound quality test
- From: Super Spinner
- Re: iPod vs Zune in blind sound quality test
- From: Snit
- Re: iPod vs Zune in blind sound quality test
- From: Craig Koller
- iPod vs Zune in blind sound quality test
- Prev by Date: Re: Microsoft Surface
- Next by Date: Re: Microsoft Surface
- Previous by thread: Re: iPod vs Zune in blind sound quality test
- Next by thread: Fortune: Apple TV is a "dud"
- Index(es):