Re: iPod vs Zune in blind sound quality test

In article <mKmdnZ9epsRHTsPbnZ2dnUVZ_tqnnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Brian" <bradpedki@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"none" <a@xxxxx> wrote in message
news:a-64674A.06070531052007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Craig Koller <cwkollertwo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=KmSzRV7ET94

They are non-standard head phones... wonder if that has any effect?

Six people? And the first listener said "definitely this one" and it was
the iPod... And CNET brands 4 to 2 a "landslide victory".

Wow. I'd expect that from Joe Blow blogger but CNET? C'mon ... pretty
shoddy.

yeah, come on CNET a test of 6 people? How bogus can you get.

Bottom line:

The iPod hasn't been updated for a LONG time uses the sound chip:
Wolfson Microelectronics WM8758

The Zune which is less than a year old:
Wolfson Microelectronics WM8978G

The Zune will behind again once the widescreen iPod is released in
September. It's called leapfrog and the Zune has a tiny difference in
quality at the moment.


Zune CRUSHES the iPod in sound quality. Just like every other 2 dollar MP3
player. Everything Apple makes is *** in shiny plastic. Anyone who buys
Apple products is so incredibly stupid I feel sorry for them.

That's a lot of people to feel sorry for. :)


--
Sandman[.net]
.

Quantcast