Re: iPod vs Zune in blind sound quality test
- From: "Brian" <bradpedki@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 09:55:10 -0400
"none" <a@xxxxx> wrote in message news:a-64674A.06070531052007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Craig Koller <cwkollertwo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > http://youtube.com/watch?v=KmSzRV7ET94
> >
> They are non-standard head phones... wonder if that has any effect?
Six people? And the first listener said "definitely this one" and it was
the iPod... And CNET brands 4 to 2 a "landslide victory".
Wow. I'd expect that from Joe Blow blogger but CNET? C'mon ... pretty
shoddy.
yeah, come on CNET a test of 6 people? How bogus can you get.
Bottom line:
The iPod hasn't been updated for a LONG time uses the sound chip:
Wolfson Microelectronics WM8758
The Zune which is less than a year old:
Wolfson Microelectronics WM8978G
The Zune will behind again once the widescreen iPod is released in
September. It's called leapfrog and the Zune has a tiny difference in
quality at the moment.
Zune CRUSHES the iPod in sound quality. Just like every other 2 dollar MP3 player. Everything Apple makes is *** in shiny plastic. Anyone who buys Apple products is so incredibly stupid I feel sorry for them.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: iPod vs Zune in blind sound quality test
- From: Snit
- Re: iPod vs Zune in blind sound quality test
- From: none
- Re: iPod vs Zune in blind sound quality test
- From: Sandman
- Re: iPod vs Zune in blind sound quality test
- References:
- iPod vs Zune in blind sound quality test
- From: Super Spinner
- Re: iPod vs Zune in blind sound quality test
- From: Snit
- Re: iPod vs Zune in blind sound quality test
- From: Craig Koller
- Re: iPod vs Zune in blind sound quality test
- From: none
- iPod vs Zune in blind sound quality test
- Prev by Date: Re: Microsoft Surface
- Next by Date: Re: Microsoft Surface
- Previous by thread: Re: iPod vs Zune in blind sound quality test
- Next by thread: Re: iPod vs Zune in blind sound quality test
- Index(es):