Re: Apple sued over LCD screens

On May 19, 12:44 am, Snit <C...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Alan Baker" <alangba...@xxxxxxxxx> stated in post
alangbaker-525858.22385518052...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 5/18/07 10:38 PM:

In article
<colalovesmacs-333673.20415618052...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Oxford <colalovesm...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

PC Guy <p...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

So much for better quality products:

http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=416

no doubt about it, apple fucked up.

There is considerable doubt.

If there were no doubt, there'd be no need for a lawsuit or atrial...

Not true: even if there is *no* reasonable doubt that someone is guilty of
committing a crime there is still an obligation for the legal system to
*presume* innocence until the accused has been proved guilty beyond a
reasonable doubt by the legal system - in other words, there is still the
need for due process / adjudication.

Why doesn't Alan answer any of us?

.

Quantcast