Re: Another attempt to bring peace to CSMA (I would say OT, but it seems to be the main topic!)
- From: Snit <CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 15:49:04 -0700
"Steve Carroll" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
noone-58973E.16272717052007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 5/17/07 3:27 PM:
In article <C271C99A.818A1%CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Snit <CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"nospamatall" <nospamatall@xxxxxx> stated in post f2hsg7$el9$3@xxxxxxxx on
5/17/07 8:31 AM:
Snit wrote:
The silly debates are once again getting out of hand. I notice that muchAny chance you could do it on email?
of
the debates are of the form:
Person A: You just said A!
Person B: No, I said B!
Person A: No, you said A!
Person B: No, I said B!
I think in many of these cases maybe the first comment was either worded
poorly or simply misunderstood. Once someone clarifies their views it
should be accepted - at least in most cases. I admit I have been guilty
of
not accepting someone's revision or clarification I the past, and I
beleive
so have Edwin, Sandman, Carroll and Adams - each of the folks I have
recently been debating with.
I would prefer not... but I would like to keep it in this thread, so folks
who do not want to read it can avoid it easily.
Geez... do you really think this guy is as stupid as you need him to be to
believe the lie you just told? Trust me... while you may have partially fooled
him about some things here or there... he isn't likely to fall for what he
already knows is a lie. He's seen you do exactly the opposite of what you
claim
you'd like to do ( "keep it in this thread") too many times. We've all seen...
Your lying is noted, Steve. Note how I, not you, have asked to have
misunderstandings cleared up and to allow you, and others, to explain
yourself where you have not been understood. I also asked for you to do the
same to/for me - ask me reasonable questions where you think I should clear
my views up. Once again I show that I am honest and honorable... and none
of you are able to show that about yourselves. The reasons why are very,
very clear: none of you see yourselves as being honest and honorable... your
actions define who you are - you specifically want to spew BS accusations
and attribute straw men to me. As you do, above. So be it, at least you
are so far gone in your current melt down that you do not even try to hide
your BS.
--
? Nuclear arms are arms
? OS X's Command+Scroll wheel function does not exist in default XP
? Technical competence and intelligence are not the same thing
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Another attempt to bring peace to CSMA (I would say OT, but it seems to be the main topic!)
- From: Snit
- Re: Another attempt to bring peace to CSMA (I would say OT, but it seems to be the main topic!)
- From: nospamatall
- Re: Another attempt to bring peace to CSMA (I would say OT, but it seems to be the main topic!)
- From: Snit
- Re: Another attempt to bring peace to CSMA (I would say OT, but it seems to be the main topic!)
- From: Steve Carroll
- Another attempt to bring peace to CSMA (I would say OT, but it seems to be the main topic!)
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Reasons why Snit is the worst troll ever seen in csma - WAS - Re: Apple gets served!
- Next by Date: Re: Another attempt to bring peace to CSMA (I would say OT, but it seems to be the main topic!)
- Previous by thread: Re: Another attempt to bring peace to CSMA (I would say OT, but it seems to be the main topic!)
- Next by thread: Re: Another attempt to bring peace to CSMA (I would say OT, but it seems to be the main topic!)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading