Re: Way to go Adobe!

In article <DNednX-OEqa-D6HbnZ2dnUVZ_sGqnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"John" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Tim Adams" <teadams$2$0$0$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:teadams$2$0$0$3-D01175.09324005052007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <aeydnecSr8LfZ6bbnZ2dnUVZ_h-vnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"John" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Steve Carroll" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:noone-86104F.21012004052007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <-8idnUjnQKb-VKbbnZ2dnUVZ_vGinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"John" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Steve Carroll" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:noone-2D3E22.17440404052007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <4uWdncwO29eIWabbnZ2dnUVZ_rSjnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"John" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Steve Carroll" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:noone-9710C8.16490604052007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <e_CdncF4tO2QO6bbnZ2dnUVZ_v2knZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"John" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Steve Carroll" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:noone-131586.15262804052007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <TPidnVYVwcpsyqbbnZ2dnUVZ_q-vnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"John" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Steve Carroll" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:noone-182013.09360604052007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <166dnaGpKPvb36bbnZ2dnUVZ_uSgnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"John" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Sandman" <mr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mr-E64CAE.09452304052007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The serial for the Adobe Photoshop CS3 beta has now
expired.
The
Master Collection bundle, which I have ordered, hasn't
been
released
yet. D'oh!

--
Sandman[.net]
\

No problem at all on this end. Had you ordered Design
Premium
there
would
be no problem. Sounds like your usual technical
incompetence.

His beta software serial number has run out and you're
blaming
him,
Snit
Jr.?
Why am I not surprised...



As usual you are technically clueless about what is going on.
It
was
clearly stated that the suite he ordered wouldn't be
available
for
awhile
yet he ordered it anyhow and is complaining because his beta
serial
number
expired. Adobe all along had stated that the beta would
expire
upon
Photoshop CS3 release.

And yet, here you are, blaming Sandman for the expiration.
How
Snittish
of you.
Feel free to point out the part where I'm "technically
clueless"
any
time
you'd
like. Speaking of "technically clueless"... you're an idiot
for
suggesting
Sandman order something he didn't want. Strange that you're
even
aware
that
Adobe was going to expire the beta program while you
simultaneously
blame
the
occurrence of it on Sandman's "technical incompetence"... how
Snittish
of
you.


As usual you have not been able to comprehend reality.
Sandaman
is
not
being blamed for the expiration but is being blamed for
knowlingly
buying
the wrong product even though ADOBE MADE CLEAR it would not be
delivered
until long after the CS3 beta expired.

I obviously did comprehend that. Of course, you, being too stupid
to
understand
what you just replied to, missed it. The people here that are
'technically
incompetent' are the people from Adobe for not having a bit of
overlap
on
their
beta releases of pro products. If you were an "actual"
professional
you'd
understand why... but you're not... so you don't... and you
blamed
it
on
Sandman
instead. That you have Snit standing next to you is all the clue
you
really
should need to realize your error. Oh well.



You are one seriously screwed up person Steve. Adobe DID have
overlap
on
Photoshop CS3. It was released on Apr 20,2007. The beta expired
on
May
2.
That is 2 weeks of overlap. Yet Sandman ordered product in
addition
to
Photoshop which he had ZERO use for. It is the usual case of him
buying
the
most expensive product available so he can brag about it. Next
time
get
your facts straight before hallucinating about a subject being
discussed.

Any piece of software that is included in any of their pro suites
should
not
have beta serials expire before the software is released. This is a
situation
where Adobe stepped on their collective dicks... totally
unprofessional.
No
whining or finger pointing by you can change the reality that Adobe
created for
their customers. Adobe charges professional prices... they should
act
like
professionals. You sound like a kid that Sandman beat up one too
many
times.



As usual you are full of it. Sandman ordered product IN ADDITION to
Photoshop with which NO BETA as of Apr 20 had even been distributed.
In
fact the beta versions were not even made available until a short time
ago.

Sandman stated that he ordered the Master Collection. Above, you're
saying
that
he ordered Photoshop "IN ADDITION to" that "product". Explain, oh
technical
genius, why he would do that?



Steve you stupid idiot. He ordered a suite which CONTAINS Photoshop and
ALL
of the other Adobe Apps solely because it was the most expensive
collection.

I'm sure you can show all sorts of support for that claim, right snit?

He wouldn't have purchased it because it was the one package that offered
him
_all_ of the programs he wanted/needed so he wouldn't have a need to buy a
different package and then some individual packages, right?

Master Collection contains -

Adobe InDesign® CS3
Photoshop® CS3 Extended
Illustrator® CS3
Acrobat® 8 Professional
Flash® CS3 Professional
Dreamweaver® CS3
Fireworks® CS3
Contribute® CS3
After Effects® CS3 Professional
Adobe Premiere® Pro CS3
Soundbooth'Ñ¢ CS3
and Encore® CS3
Adobe Bridge CS3
Version Cue® CS3
Device Central CS3
Dynamic Link
Adobe OnLocation'Ñ¢ CS3 (Windows¬Æ only)
Ultra® CS3 (Windows only).

Design Premium contains -

Adobe InDesign® CS3
Photoshop® CS3 Extended
Illustrator® CS3
Flash® CS3 Professional
Dreamweaver® CS3
Acrobat® 8 Professional
Bridge CS3
Version Cue® CS3
Device Central CS3.

So sad that you apparently can't see the differences between these two
packages.


So sad that you can't see that a technically incompetent Sandman (who is not
a Pro) would never need Master Collection.

I'm sure a technically incompetent boob like yourself (as proved several time
when you were posting as winman) can support your claim.

From looking at Sandman's web site and comparing it to the garbage snit has
linked to, any competent person can clearly see that it's not Sandman that's
incompetent, at least in web design.

--
regarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm
.

Loading