Re: Way to go Adobe!


"Steve Carroll" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:noone-2D5306.18044604052007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <bLydnQKDNcb_WabbnZ2dnUVZ_qWvnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"John" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Steve Carroll" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:noone-94972E.17021404052007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <C260F722.7F50C%CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Snit <CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> "John" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
>> e_CdncF4tO2QO6bbnZ2dnUVZ_v2knZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx on 5/4/07 2:30 PM:
>>
>> >>> As usual you are technically clueless about what is going on. It
>> >>> was
>> >>> clearly stated that the suite he ordered wouldn't be available for
>> >>> awhile
>> >>> yet he ordered it anyhow and is complaining because his beta >> >>> serial
>> >>> number
>> >>> expired. Adobe all along had stated that the beta would expire >> >>> upon
>> >>> Photoshop CS3 release.
>> >>>
>> >> And yet, here you are, blaming Sandman for the expiration. How
>> >> Snittish
>> >> of
>> >> you. Feel free to point out the part where I'm "technically >> >> clueless"
>> >> any
>> >> time you'd like.
>>
>> Oh! Oh! Is that open to all? How about when you got confused and
>> thought
>> I could not upgrade a router's firmware?
>
> Are you talking about where you admitted you needed the help of Linksys
> support
> group to accomplish that task? Besides... it wasn't just the firmware, > you
> also
> had trouble disabling DHCP. Of course, you tried to pretend it was a > bug
> in
> their product (funny how nothing is ever your fault). You even sent me > to
> the
> site when I asked you to support that there ever was such a bug that
> Linksys
> would recognize, you said there were people talking about it. That > turned
> out to
> be a lie... as was the late issuance of the firmware update you said
> wasn't
> there... but it was.
>
>

Linksys products have HAD MULTIPLE BUGS. As evidenced by multiple firmware
upgrades.

Your point? Or did you fail to realize I was talking about a specific bug that
Snit claimed? The firmware upgrade that he said didn't exist was on the site...
very easy to find and its accompanying data *** didn't say one word about the
bug Snit was referring to. Obviously, Snit didn't expect anyone to call him on
his tale and actually check the site.



It is STANDARD PROCEDURE for virtually 100% of companies out there not to list 100% of the bugs corrected in a firmware or software updates release notes. Had you ever worked as a professional you would know that.

.