Re: A Greener Apple

"C Lund" <clund@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
clund-4044E3.09444203052007@xxxxxxxxxxx on 5/3/07 12:44 AM:

In article <C25EB213.7F2BE%CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Snit <CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"John C. Randolph" <jcr.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
2007050221013775249-jcrnospam@nospammaccom on 5/2/07 9:01 PM:
I am glad that Greenpeace does work toward making companies more
responsible, I just wish they would do so in an honest way.
No, they don't. Greenpeace works towards getting companies to pay them
to shut up and *** off.
Do not confuse Greenpeace with an environmental organization. They are
nothing but publicity whores.

Greenpeace is a scam. Pure and simple.

Do not get me wrong, I am not blind to their many, many downsides and the BS
they pull... they do a lot of bone headed and purposely evil things... but
they have also raised awareness of environmental issues and the like.

But not in a good way. When a high-profile environment organization
like GP is as dishonest as they are, they make people wonder about
claims made by other, honest, environmental organizations.

True... and they seem to be getting worse.


--
? The tilde in an OS X path does *not* mean "the hard drive only"
? Things which are not the same are not "identical"
? The word "ouch" is not a sure sign of agreement.



.