Re: Why Snit is treated the way he is (was: Re: Time's Person of the Year - The iMac)
- From: Snit <CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:34:50 -0700
"Sandman" <mr@xxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
mr-6211DD.19035718122006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 12/18/06 11:03 AM:
In article <C1AC1FA3.6BFD6%SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Snit <SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
i was just joking about this thread topic and you know it... or maybe
you don't... and your humor really is rusty.
So claiming to be joking when caught lying is going to be your new
tactic. What does Snit think about you copying his methods?
yes, that is "copying" my methods.
Thank you for admitting that "joking when caught lying" is your method.
You know, Sandman, your lies have gotten more and more extreme recently.
You used to at least try to hide them... now you just spew your lies and
hope that your troll friends will support you. Whatever.
Yeah
At least you admit to your actions here. And below you try to excuse
them... by pointing to my mistakenly misattributing a quote *years* ago...
and then admitting it and apologizing.
Wow. Just wow.
, you reap what you sow. If you weren't such a huge quote mangler,
quote forger, PDF forger, liar, troll and sock puppeteer then I might
treat like an ordinary poster. You know, like I once did before I
realised what a big troll you are.
When I did things like try to help you out with your price comparisons:
<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b669e2efdb384
804?>
Or when I gave you some advice since you were new to the group:
<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/77cb07c7786a6
65b> (btw, it's uncanny how much point 1 and 2 is true for you)
Again, that was way back before I realized you were not just a troll,
you grew to be the biggest troll in the history of csma! That's some
feat!
Do you even remember what lead me to "oppose" you, Snit? It was this:
<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/800b954017ff7
43d>
This was when you were quote scavenging about ed, and you somehow had
a quote about me in the post. I asked you mutliple times why and you
never gave me an answer:
<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d35dac96802ee
169>
I picked this followup since it's ironically showing me thinking the
idea of me as a troll in csma is a funny idea. Something you've been
pushing since, which you coincidentally started doing after I called
you a troll. Go figure. And when did I start to expose your trolls?
Well, since you never could give me a reply to as why you had
quote-scavanged me, I agreed to verify the mail from you to Steve
Carroll in his hotmail. Remember, this was before I had anything "in"
for you. I was naturally perplexed by your quote scavenging but said
repeatedly that I don't care about your business with the other (at
the time, Elizabot and Steve):
<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/6b77b76586cef
a94>
And here is my post, after verifying, as an objective bystander:
<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9106204becee2
8c5>
Nothing about Snit in my message. Just a favor to Steve who asked if
someone could verify the mail. After that, you were so kind as to
include me in your agenda on csma.
Of course, you'll just ignore all of the above and claim I'm
"babbling". That's your latest diversion tactic when you can't face
facts.
To obfuscate your lying, trolling, dishonest snipping, pirating, and
generally just making an ass out of yourself you point to a post I made
*years* ago where I accidentally misattributed a quote and then, when it was
pointed out, I admitted to it and apologized.
Wow. Just wow. You are in need of more help then I thought you were. I
mean, really, Sandman... is that why motivates your trolling to this day?
Is that why you *really* lie about your CSS and your web site and you
dishonestly snip, etc.
Unbelievable how desperate you are to blame your actions on me. Just
amazing.
--
? The tilde in an OS X path does *not* mean "the hard drive only"
? Things which are not the same are not "identical"
? The word "ouch" is not a sure sign of agreement.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Second run
- Next by Date: Re: We have used both
- Previous by thread: why mac advocacy is winning
- Next by thread: Why did my friend have these problems?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
