Re: Some quotes Sandman posted to antagonize others.
- From: Sandman <mr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:49:16 +0200
In article <C257BFD3.7EAB8%CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Snit <CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Incorrect. I whine when people snip and run. I do not whine when
people
merely do not respond to all points of a post.
And you are the sole arbiter of when that act is "snipping and
running" and not "ignoring parts of a post". Ironically, "snipping and
running" seems to be determined by one factor; "It's when others do
it".
If you are ignorant enough to not be able to tell when you dishonestly
snip,
I am perfectly able to tell when you think I "dishonestly snip". The
sole criteria is "Sandman snipped". But, when you snip - or ignore
parts of a post - it's not dishonest. Ever. Ironic!
You ran from this.
And this is a lie from you
It's a funny, actual quote.
Note how you dishonestly snipped my comments. Here is what I said
What you said was irrelevant to it being a funny actual quote from
you.
And this.
You repeatedly and dishonestly snip that and similar text and pretend it
does not exist.
I wish I could pretend that your Circus didn't exist.
Here is one of the things you snipped and ran from in response to that
same
trolling BS from you
I will yet again snip your Snit Circus. But I can't for the life of me
pretend it doesn't exist.
And this.
You repeatedly and dishonestly snip that and similar text and pretend it
does not exist.
Is that what you do when you snip text?
And this.
As I have noted, you are a liar.
As everyone else have noted, you've yet to support that. :-D
Hopefully, no one is holding their breath :)
And this.
No, Sandman, I will not tell you which ones.
You can't. They don't exist.
What you snipped and ran from:
...contained nothing that substantiated their existence. :)
And this.
You are lying. Note your complete and total lack of support.
Apart, of course, from the posted substantiation. Ooops.
By all means link to your "substantiation".
They were posted in that very thread. Post nr 34 on Google. Ooops
again.
And this.
PS 2: Hey, aren't you the one who is so against antagonizing threads?
As opposed to you, you mean?
Are you or are you not against the type of antagonizing threads you
started
here?
I am for pointing out when you match the objective troll criteria you
requested. I have never claimed to never act in ways one of the
criteria. Fortunately, as opposed to you, my posts don't all match
some five or six of the criteria, all the time.
And this.
As usual, you run away from entire posts just to add irrelevant stuff
at the end. Reply to my post in its entirety and then add issues you
want introduced. BUt if you won't reply to my points, why should I
reply to yours?
--
Sandman[.net]
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Some quotes.
- From: Sandman
- Re: Some quotes Sandman posted to antagonize others.
- From: Snit
- Re: Some quotes Sandman posted to antagonize others.
- From: Sandman
- Re: Some quotes Sandman posted to antagonize others.
- From: Snit
- Re: Some quotes Sandman posted to antagonize others.
- From: Sandman
- Re: Some quotes Sandman posted to antagonize others.
- From: Snit
- Some quotes.
- Prev by Date: Re: Some quotes
- Next by Date: Re: Article: Writing effective ALT text for images
- Previous by thread: Re: Some quotes Sandman posted to antagonize others.
- Next by thread: Re: Some quotes Sandman posted to antagonize others.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
