Re: the exploit that wasn't
- From: Steve de Mena <steven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 12:30:20 -0700
DanielEran wrote:
And what about the others? Recall that this was a FULLY patchedWhat about the other what?
system.
The other Mac Book Pro? It was not compromised. There were two, and
only one was given away.
http://www.roughlydrafted.com/RD/RDM.Tech.Q2.07/616874CC-35CE-49D3-B859-C2719B6FF352.html
Instead of discussing what happened at CanSecWest we just get yet another anti-Microsoft rant, rehashing the same old tired myths again and again.
Yawn.
Steve
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: the exploit that wasn't
- From: Tom Reestman
- Re: the exploit that wasn't
- References:
- the exploit that wasn't
- From: none
- Re: the exploit that wasn't
- From: Snit
- Re: the exploit that wasn't
- From: PC Guy
- Re: the exploit that wasn't
- From: Snit
- Re: the exploit that wasn't
- From: DanielEran
- the exploit that wasn't
- Prev by Date: Re: (OT) Something From An Ignorant Right Winger
- Next by Date: Re: Leopard delays
- Previous by thread: Re: the exploit that wasn't
- Next by thread: Re: the exploit that wasn't
- Index(es):