Re: the exploit that wasn't
- From: Snit <CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 08:26:17 -0700
"none" <a@xxxxx> stated in post
a-0AFD0F.08492621042007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 4/21/07 7:49 AM:
egg on the face of infoworld -
Nancy Gohring, writing for InfoWorld, delivered a misleading report
yesterday on a Mac security exploit contest held at the CanSecWest
conference in Vancouver, BC.
In her defense, it appears likely that Gohring did not write the
headline for her InfoWorld article, which described the contest winner
as being ³able to remotely break into a Mac as part of a contest
designed to illustrate security flaws in OS X.² That part was simply
wrong.
Whoever did write the headline must have been smoking weed in
celebration of 4/20, because Gohring¹s article clearly described a local
exploit. There¹s a big difference between the remote exploits that made
Windows infamous for its insecurity and a local exploit of an
application.
Gohring reported that ³contestants were invited to try to access one of
two Macs through a wireless access point while the Macs had no programs
running. No attackers managed to do so, and so conference organizers
allowed participants to try to get in through the browser by sending
URLs via e-mail.²
Opening an email URL that exposes a security flaw in Safari is both news
to report and a problem for Apple to tackle, but reporting it as a
remote exploit is inaccurate, irresponsible, and sloppy journalism,
particularly for IDG's InfoWorld, which purports to be an authority on
computing.
If the reports are true then this is a big problem for Apple to "tackle".
Allowing a computer to be taken over by merely viewing a web site is not a
small deal... it is the type thing that has hit Windows time and time again
and the far lower risk of this on Macs has always been an advantage. I hope
Apple fixes this very, very quickly.
--
? A partial subset is not synonymous with the whole
? A person's actions speak more about him than what others say
? Apple doesn't provide as many options as the rest of the PC industry
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: the exploit that wasn't
- From: Lawson English
- Re: the exploit that wasn't
- From: PC Guy
- Re: the exploit that wasn't
- References:
- the exploit that wasn't
- From: none
- the exploit that wasn't
- Prev by Date: Re: Mac Hack
- Next by Date: Re: We have used both
- Previous by thread: Re: the exploit that wasn't
- Next by thread: Re: the exploit that wasn't
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|