Re: Retractions

"Steve Carroll" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
noone-28C1E1.10530918042007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 4/18/07 9:53 AM:


The fact you can delude yourself into thinking quotes about you are of no
importance is not in question, Steve. Face it, you compiled a bunch of
quotes about me...

You're lying... again... it's what you do.

I returned the "favor". You panicked and started lying
about how the quotes about me somehow are of more importance and the ones
about you are not.

You're "lying" about me compiling quotes... and you're 'panicking'
because I'm pointing out what was obvious about your "bunch"... it was a
padded list that anyone can get on anyone else in csma in a short period
of time. You need to "Face it"... you can't make people look like you
look. Anyone drawing any similarities between you and *anyone* else will
be met with a list of stuff you've pulled that no one else can lay claim
to.

Then you whined and claimed you troll and flame me based on the fact that I
had a web page about you... so as a favor I removed it. Do you need me to
return it to the web so you can see the quotes again?

I insist you do it... we can trace down the nature of all the "lies" I
supposedly told. Then we'll trace your history. We both know that you
changed the list from my above complaint so it'll be fun to see your
newer list. I can prove you did exactly what I said and I'll even do you
the "favor" of not letting you tell a new lie I would easily catch you
in... take a look:

<mr-49A222.17564015072006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

It's Sandman, backing up my point about you padding your "bunch". My
prediction: You will now create some other sort of bizarre BS that I'll
flog you with reality over; you are a glutton for such 'punishment'.

You insist? LOL! No, Steve, you are in no position to insist I do a thing.
Ask *nicely* and I shall... or, perhaps, I shall at my own whim, being that
your comments about your trolling be tied to my having your name on my
website was clearly another of your lies. Above you spew a bunch of BS you
should apologize for and post retractions for, but being that you have run
every time you have put yourself in that situation, why should I waste my
time detailing your lies.

You will lie. You will spew insults. You will not do the honest and
honorable thing of ending that activity, apologizing for it, nor retracting
it. You have proved that, Steve. So let me just say I note your lies and
your silly insults, and we both know you will *never* do the right thing in
regards to your comments.


--
? If A = B then B = A (known as the "symmetric property of equality")
? Incest and sex are not identical (only a pervert would disagree)
? One can be actually guilty of a crime but neither tried nor convicted




.

Relevant Pages
Loading