Re: VT Shooter, A Mac user.... (maybe, maybe not)

"Jesus" <rustybucket666@xxxxxxxxx> stated in post
1176870003.056548.22760@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 4/17/07 9:20 PM:

Go tell your lawyer that in the forum you posted under an alias while
trolling a newsgroup people said things you didn't like. Come back and
talk about that experience. You'll get a really expensive lesson in
reality... and I'll get another laugh at your expense. You can't be
this stupid... you just CAN'T be...

FACT: When Steve went away for a week 95% of BS off-topic trolling
went away!

Steve showed senitivity and actually condemned MuahMan's post. You
responded by making equally obnoxious and disgusting comments. I think
you just won this contest for being a fucking ***.

Steve, I apologize for anything I may have said about you that was
untrue. John, you can go to hell.

Jesus THE DUMBEST ASS of them all. Not only are you technically
incompetent but you failed to notice I responded to Steve based on his
trolling of Snit.

*** off loser dumbass.

You failed to notice I was reacting to that in combination with your
insensitive comments.

Look at Steve's comments:

Go tell your lawyer that in the forum you posted under an
alias while trolling a newsgroup people said things you
didn't like. Come back and talk about that experience.
You'll get a really expensive lesson in reality... and I'll
get another laugh at your expense. You can't be this
stupid... you just CAN'T be...

Steve spewed, into a public forum, all sorts of accusations and insults. If
he was honest and honorable he would offer a retraction. Sure, John could
have merely noted that... but look at what good it does to ask Steve to take
responsibility for his actions - he simply does not do so. If that was not
clear before, look at my exchanges with him over the last 24 hours - he
proved it over and over.

Steve does not care how despicable and dishonest his comments are - he
simply will blame others for their content. It is what he calls a "victim
mentality".

That's great. That's not the point of my post. Steve righfully
condemned Zara's and MuahMan's posts, while John took the same tactic
by blaming Vista for pepole getting shot.

If John did that it was not right. Above, however, it looks like John was
responding to the comments I quoted and merely noted:

FACT: When Steve went away for a week 95% of BS off-topic
trolling went away!

The full post of Steve's that John replied to can be seen here:
<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a18f3409ffa7708e>

Steve was not condemning Zara or Muahman with those comments, he was
responding to my stating that people should be careful of the accusations
they toss around CSMA. I did not even mention Steve though, as any long
time reader of CSMA knows, he is likely the worst example of people who do
such things. Heck, he seems to take pride in his inappropriate actions.

Does that not bother you, Snit? How much of an insensitive *** does John
have to be to think that is at all appropriate? John owes ALL Windows users
and ALL the people affected by that shooting an apology. Why are you more
interested in Steve accusing you of posting under a different alias than
getting John to apologize? Even worse, why are you replying on behalf of John
again?

If John did as you said I do not approve... but I responded to John's
comments about Steve's comments because Steve was responding to my
comments... there is nothing wrong with that.


--
? Deleting from a *Save* dialog is not a sign of well done design
? A personal computer without an OS is crippled by that lacking

.