Re: VT Shooter, A Mac user.... (maybe, maybe not)


"Jesus" <rustybucket666@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1176860227.796151.127130@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Apr 17, 9:14 pm, "John" <nos...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Jesus" <rustybucket...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:1176857849.445288.165410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



> On Apr 17, 8:45 pm, "John" <nos...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> "Steve Carroll" <n...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

>>news:noone-ADEB1B.16255217042007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

>> > In article <C24A95FE.7DA9E%C...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> > Snit <C...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> >> "Dr. zara" <d...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
>> >> jDbVh.5845$Zm3.1...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 4/17/07 3:13 PM:

>> >> > "-hh" <recscuba_goo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >> >news:1176843977.168148.194330@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> On Apr 17, 4:49 pm, Dave Fritzinger <dfrit...@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> wrote:

>> >> >>> To be fair, I am very pleased that the majority of the Windows
>> >> >>> advocates here have, rightly, slammed Muahman, as he deserves.
>> >> >>> This
>> >> >>> shows that, though we disagree with them about computer choice
>> >> >>> (and,
>> >> >>> in some cases, much else), they are reasonable people. I >> >> >>> certainly
>> >> >>> wouldn't put Windows advocates such as Tom Elam, Edwin and the
>> >> >>> Mayor
>> >> >>> in the same catagory as Zara and Muahman.

>> >> > Remember when you expressed the desire to shoot and kill me? If
>> >> > you
>> >> > forgot - I didn't.

>> >> People in CSMA often have no idea what liability their online >> >> threats
>> >> and
>> >> accusations can lead to... dishonest accusations of rape and
>> >> inappropriate
>> >> sexual advances, claims of illegal drug use, or even of just
>> >> accusations
>> >> of
>> >> making calls and emails to someone's home based on Usenet debates >> >> have
>> >> been
>> >> thrown around in CSMA, for example.

>> >> Those who toss around such things in a public forum are putting
>> >> themselves
>> >> in a position to be held legally liable... something they clearly >> >> are
>> >> too
>> >> ignorant to understand.

>> > Go tell your lawyer that in the forum you posted under an alias >> > while
>> > trolling a newsgroup people said things you didn't like. Come back >> > and
>> > talk about that experience. You'll get a really expensive lesson in
>> > reality... and I'll get another laugh at your expense. You can't be
>> > this
>> > stupid... you just CAN'T be...

>> FACT: When Steve went away for a week 95% of BS off-topic trolling >> went
>> away!

> Steve showed senitivity and actually condemned MuahMan's post. You
> responded by making equally obnoxious and disgusting comments. I
> think you just won this contest for being a fucking ***.

> Steve, I apologize for anything I may have said about you that was
> untrue. John, you can go to hell.

Jesus THE DUMBEST ASS of them all. Not only are you technically incompetent
but you failed to notice I responded to Steve based on his trolling of Snit.

*** off loser dumbass.

You failed to notice I was reacting to that in combination with your
insensitive comments.



I never fail to notice that you NEVER read before responding and rank right up there with the most clueless who have ever posted to this group.

.