Re: VT Shooter, A Mac user.... (maybe, maybe not)


"Jesus" <rustybucket666@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1176857849.445288.165410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Apr 17, 8:45 pm, "John" <nos...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Steve Carroll" <n...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:noone-ADEB1B.16255217042007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



> In article <C24A95FE.7DA9E%C...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Snit <C...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> "Dr. zara" <d...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
>> jDbVh.5845$Zm3.1...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 4/17/07 3:13 PM:

>> > "-hh" <recscuba_goo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >news:1176843977.168148.194330@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> On Apr 17, 4:49 pm, Dave Fritzinger <dfrit...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> >>> To be fair, I am very pleased that the majority of the Windows
>> >>> advocates here have, rightly, slammed Muahman, as he deserves. >> >>> This
>> >>> shows that, though we disagree with them about computer choice >> >>> (and,
>> >>> in some cases, much else), they are reasonable people. I certainly
>> >>> wouldn't put Windows advocates such as Tom Elam, Edwin and the >> >>> Mayor
>> >>> in the same catagory as Zara and Muahman.

>> > Remember when you expressed the desire to shoot and kill me? If >> > you
>> > forgot - I didn't.

>> People in CSMA often have no idea what liability their online threats >> and
>> accusations can lead to... dishonest accusations of rape and
>> inappropriate
>> sexual advances, claims of illegal drug use, or even of just >> accusations
>> of
>> making calls and emails to someone's home based on Usenet debates have
>> been
>> thrown around in CSMA, for example.

>> Those who toss around such things in a public forum are putting
>> themselves
>> in a position to be held legally liable... something they clearly are >> too
>> ignorant to understand.

> Go tell your lawyer that in the forum you posted under an alias while
> trolling a newsgroup people said things you didn't like. Come back and
> talk about that experience. You'll get a really expensive lesson in
> reality... and I'll get another laugh at your expense. You can't be > this
> stupid... you just CAN'T be...

FACT: When Steve went away for a week 95% of BS off-topic trolling went
away!

Steve showed senitivity and actually condemned MuahMan's post. You
responded by making equally obnoxious and disgusting comments. I
think you just won this contest for being a fucking ***.

Steve, I apologize for anything I may have said about you that was
untrue. John, you can go to hell.


Jesus THE DUMBEST ASS of them all. Not only are you technically incompetent but you failed to notice I responded to Steve based on his trolling of Snit.

*** off loser dumbass.

.