Re: VT Shooter, A Mac user.... (maybe, maybe not)

"Steve Carroll" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
noone-ADEB1B.16255217042007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 4/17/07 3:25 PM:

In article <C24A95FE.7DA9E%CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Snit <CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Dr. zara" <drzee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
jDbVh.5845$Zm3.1980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 4/17/07 3:13 PM:


"-hh" <recscuba_google@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1176843977.168148.194330@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Apr 17, 4:49 pm, Dave Fritzinger <dfrit...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

To be fair, I am very pleased that the majority of the Windows
advocates here have, rightly, slammed Muahman, as he deserves. This
shows that, though we disagree with them about computer choice (and,
in some cases, much else), they are reasonable people. I certainly
wouldn't put Windows advocates such as Tom Elam, Edwin and the Mayor
in the same catagory as Zara and Muahman.

Remember when you expressed the desire to shoot and kill me? If you
forgot - I didn't.


People in CSMA often have no idea what liability their online threats and
accusations can lead to... dishonest accusations of rape and inappropriate
sexual advances, claims of illegal drug use, or even of just accusations of
making calls and emails to someone's home based on Usenet debates have been
thrown around in CSMA, for example.

Those who toss around such things in a public forum are putting themselves
in a position to be held legally liable... something they clearly are too
ignorant to understand.

Go tell your lawyer that in the forum you posted under an alias while
trolling a newsgroup people said things you didn't like. Come back and
talk about that experience. You'll get a really expensive lesson in
reality... and I'll get another laugh at your expense. You can't be this
stupid... you just CAN'T be...

You should offer a retraction and apology for those baseless comments and
silly insults, Steve. But you are neither honest nor honorable, so you will
not.


--
? There is no known malware that attacks OS X in the wild
? There are two general types of PCs: Macs and PCs (odd naming conventions!)
? Mac OS X 10.x.x is a version of Mac OS


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: VT Shooter, A Mac user.... (maybe, maybe not)
    ... >>> advocates here have, rightly, slammed Muahman, as he deserves. ... >>> wouldn't put Windows advocates such as Tom Elam, ... dishonest accusations of rape and inappropriate ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: VT Shooter, A Mac user.... (maybe, maybe not)
    ... I am very pleased that the majority of the Windows ... advocates here have, rightly, slammed Muahman, as he deserves. ... wouldn't put Windows advocates such as Tom Elam, ... dishonest accusations of rape and inappropriate ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: VT Shooter, A Mac user.... (maybe, maybe not)
    ... advocates here have, rightly, slammed Muahman, as he deserves. ... accusations can lead to... ... but you failed to notice I responded to Steve based on his trolling of Snit. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: VT Shooter, A Mac user.... (maybe, maybe not)
    ... I am very pleased that the majority of the Windows ... advocates here have, rightly, slammed Muahman, as he deserves. ... wouldn't put Windows advocates such as Tom Elam, ... dishonest accusations of rape and inappropriate ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: VT Shooter, A Mac user.... (maybe, maybe not)
    ... advocates here have, rightly, slammed Muahman, as he deserves. ... wouldn't put Windows advocates such as Tom Elam, ... accusations can lead to... ... Steve showed senitivity and actually condemned MuahMan's post. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)