Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: Tim Adams <teadams$2$0$0$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 10:47:29 GMT
In article <C2470D44.7D49E%SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Snit <SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Wally" <wally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
C247D729.324A5%wally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 4/14/07 10:20 PM:
On 15/4/07 12:27 AM, in article C2464F18.7D378%SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"Snit" <SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Sandman" <mr@xxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
mr-783DED.11230614042007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 4/14/07 2:23 AM:
In article <C245CC77.7D31E%SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,My mistake. Thanks. Your testing disagrees with what Steve claimed (he
Snit <SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It doesn't work for me. That is, the keyboard shortcut works just fineWhat about the Login window? Does it "inherit" the effects from either
of course, but if I switch user, the setting does not follow. If I set
my admin, or non-admins screen to be zoomed in and reversed (call it
mode X), and switch to another account, the screen will revert back to
normal (mode A). If I change things in that account as well (mode Y),
the screen will switch to mode X when "fast user" swithing to the
first user and go to mode A when I go to the login screen.
MacBook Pro, OSX 10.4.9
PowerMac G5, OSX 10.4.9
an
admin or non-admin user?
The answer to that question is contained within the paragraph above.
specifically claimed it *did* effect the login screen):
Do you know what "specifically" means Snit?
Where did Steve specifically claimed it *did* effect the login screen?
I had noted about XP machines in a lab:
Here is the weakness: I can change the orientation from my
user account, even a non-Admin, and the orientation will
stay altered even when I log out...
As I discussed that, Steve stated:
Do you have any thoughts on the fact that, at least in the case IAs can they alter settings on a Mac. Big f*cking deal.
described, a non-Admin user can alter settings for other users?
That does not refer specifically to the login screen as in the case that
you
have quoted above Steve is shown to be responding to you talking about
*login out*!
Login out? What do you mean?
You are assuming that he 'believes' that it carries over to the login
screen
and in an effort to convince others you are as always willing to lie to
achieve that end!
But, as you note above, on OS X a user cannot do that. Steve was simply
wrong. Steve also said, of OS X:
I can, from a user account, hold down the control, option
and Apple keys on a modern Mac while pressing the number 8
and it will "screw with" others (who may want to run
graphics apps or whatever)... and it'll stay that way when I
log out. There is no video card in this equation... but I
guess you'll say it's OK due to the 'consistency'. LOL!
But, again, Steve is wrong, at least based on all accounts from others -
if
a user presses the control+option+command+8 and goes to "black on white"
mode, the effect does not carry over to the login screen.
"....and it'll stay that way when I log out."-Steve Carroll
Still no sign of Steve mentioning the 'login screen' specifically Snit!
Mention? Who said he "mentioned" it? He made a very specific claim... and
here you are playing semantic games trying to save your co-troll buddy from
his lies. How cute! I did not say he specifically used those words. When
one logs out they go to a very specific screen... at least on OS X. That
screen *is* the login screen.
In reference to my comments about a user being able to alter the
login screen, I asked:
Do you have any thoughts on the fact that, at least in the case I
described, a non-Admin user can alter settings for other users?
Funny how that statement does NOT address the login screen.
And Steve replied:
As can they alter settings on a Mac. Big f*cking deal.
Neither does that one.
So where is your proof that Steve 'specifically mentioned a login screen snit?
Nowhere to be found as usual!
~snip
--
regarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: Snit
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- References:
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: Snit
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: Steve Carroll
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: Snit
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: Snit
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: Steve Carroll
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: Snit
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: John
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: Steve Carroll
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: Snit
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: Jesus
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: Steve Carroll
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: Snit
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: Steve Carroll
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: Snit
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: Wally
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: Sandman
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: Snit
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: Sandman
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: Snit
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: Wally
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- From: Snit
- Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- Prev by Date: Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- Next by Date: Re: A Mystery Resolved
- Previous by thread: Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- Next by thread: Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|