Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness

On 15/4/07 2:32 PM, in article
noone-3EE904.00323315042007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Steve Carroll"
<noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <C247D729.324A5%wally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Wally <wally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 15/4/07 12:27 AM, in article C2464F18.7D378%SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"Snit" <SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Sandman" <mr@xxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
mr-783DED.11230614042007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 4/14/07 2:23 AM:

In article <C245CC77.7D31E%SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Snit <SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

It doesn't work for me. That is, the keyboard shortcut works just fine
of course, but if I switch user, the setting does not follow. If I set
my admin, or non-admins screen to be zoomed in and reversed (call it
mode X), and switch to another account, the screen will revert back to
normal (mode A). If I change things in that account as well (mode Y),
the screen will switch to mode X when "fast user" swithing to the
first user and go to mode A when I go to the login screen.

MacBook Pro, OSX 10.4.9
PowerMac G5, OSX 10.4.9

What about the Login window? Does it "inherit" the effects from either an
admin or non-admin user?

The answer to that question is contained within the paragraph above.

My mistake. Thanks. Your testing disagrees with what Steve claimed (he
specifically claimed it *did* effect the login screen):

Do you know what "specifically" means Snit?

If he knows... that means he is lying.

Where did Steve specifically claimed it *did* effect the login screen?

Nowhere.

I had noted about XP machines in a lab:

Here is the weakness: I can change the orientation from my
user account, even a non-Admin, and the orientation will
stay altered even when I log out...

As I discussed that, Steve stated:

Do you have any thoughts on the fact that, at least in the case I
described, a non-Admin user can alter settings for other users?
As can they alter settings on a Mac. Big f*cking deal.

That does not refer specifically to the login screen as in the case that you
have quoted above Steve is shown to be responding to you talking about
*login out*!

Gee, and just when Snit thought he had you convinced;)


You are assuming that he 'believes' that it carries over to the login screen
and in an effort to convince others you are as always willing to lie to
achieve that end!

Bingo. Snit's obviously trying to create a timeline for an argument that
doesn't even exist as coming from me. That he can't link to *me*
"specifically" stating what he just claimed I "specifically" stated
doesn't bother him at all... which is to be expected of a pathological
liar like Snit.

Unbelievable that he can have you specifically claiming something without
you actually mentioning it! How the hell does that work? Outside of Snit's
delusions that is!


But, as you note above, on OS X a user cannot do that. Steve was simply
wrong. Steve also said, of OS X:

I can, from a user account, hold down the control, option
and Apple keys on a modern Mac while pressing the number 8
and it will "screw with" others (who may want to run
graphics apps or whatever)... and it'll stay that way when I
log out. There is no video card in this equation... but I
guess you'll say it's OK due to the 'consistency'. LOL!

But, again, Steve is wrong, at least based on all accounts from others - if
a user presses the control+option+command+8 and goes to "black on white"
mode, the effect does not carry over to the login screen.

"....and it'll stay that way when I log out."-Steve Carroll

Still no sign of Steve mentioning the 'login screen' specifically Snit!

And there won't ever be one that exists outside of Snit's lies.

Steve did not specifically mention the login screen at all Snit!
No great surprise that you need to lie about that is there!

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Why I am a good mark to be bashed by reality
    ... I told you I would post the list of quotes about Steve... ... So you claim snit lies and therefore beause he lies, ... When will you stop lying? ... asshole and lie about him all you want. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: computers review
    ... Snit asserts I've only read about but am not actually experiencing ... superdrive are also known, though, not dependent upon Leopard... ... Sounds like operator error Steve. ... Sounds like BS on your part John. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • September 2008 Quotes about Steve Carroll
    ... Correct me where I misunderstand you, Steve. ... So you claim snit lies and therefore beause he lies, ... When will you stop lying? ... asshole and lie about him all you want. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
    ... "I can, from a user account, hold down the control, option and Apple ... Snit will change the criteria from his OP: ... Wow, Steve, how poorly your predictions are. ... with his lies, you come over the hill in the nick o' time.... ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: XP: Cool feature with a weakness
    ... "I can, from a user account, hold down the control, option and Apple keys ... Snit will change the criteria from his OP: ... Wow, Steve, how poorly your predictions are. ... a modern Mac while pressing the number 8 and it will "screw with" others ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)