Re: OT: Snit's argument preserved - act 2 (John's ideas about honesty and honor)


"Steve Carroll" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:noone-421DB6.20511303042007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <9OadnQcJ6-Vwlo7bnZ2dnUVZ_u2mnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"John" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Steve Carroll" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:noone-78378A.20005703042007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <qu-dnetBpcd-no7bnZ2dnUVZ_s6onZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "John" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> "Steve Carroll" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:noone-1B234D.19391903042007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > In article <tOGdnVcqI7IKb4_bnZ2dnUVZ_qKqnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> > "John" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Snit" <SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >> news:C2383EAF.7C6F4%SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> > "Tim Adams" <teadams$2$0$0$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
>> >> > teadams$2$0$0$3-2C194F.20215903042007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on
>> >> > 4/3/07
>> >> > 5:22
>> >> > PM:
>> >> >
>> >> >>>> But you claim Smit is Steve (a lie as far as I can see as >> >> >>>> nobody
>> >> >>>> has
>> >> >>>> posted
>> >> >>>> any proof that Smit is Steve) and that while Steve wasn't >> >> >>>> posting
>> >> >>>> all
>> >> >>>> was
>> >> >>>> 'calm'. What you fail to address, and appear to be running >> >> >>>> from,
>> >> >>>> is
>> >> >>>> supporting your claim that Smit is Steve because IF you prove
>> >> >>>> that
>> >> >>>> (bet
>> >> >>>> you
>> >> >>>> can't), then you've lied that Steve didn't post for a week. >> >> >>>> IOW
>> >> >>>> damned
>> >> >>>> if
>> >> >>>> you do and damned if you don't.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> You are one clueless idiot.(As one would have to be to support
>> >> >>> Steve)
>> >> >>> Smit
>> >> >>> RARELY posted. And I emphasize RARELY
>> >> >>>
>> >> >> Yet he DID post, so IF he is Steve, you were wrong about Steve >> >> >> not
>> >> >> posting
>> >> >> for a week. Thanks for clearing that up.
>> >> >
>> >> > Steve did not post with his "common" name... he posted only with >> >> > his
>> >> > sock
>> >> > puppets. This, of course, was very, very clear in context to >> >> > anyone
>> >> > who
>> >> > has
>> >> > basic reading comprehension skills.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Actually keep in mind that Smit could possibly be Elizabeth.
>> >
>> > So, then you admit that it's possible you are both just ignorant
>> > dimwits
>> > who accuse people when you don't really know jack ***. It's about
>> > time... you can apologize whenever you like.
>> >
>>
>> There WILL NEVER be ANY apology to a jerk like you .
>
> So... like Snit, you have no honesty or honor. Are you going to start
> making delusional claims that you are honest and honorable now, too?
>

FACT:



FACT: Steve leaves for a week and 95% of the BS trolling goes away.

.

Loading