Re: Leopard delayed
- From: "Al Phi" <bjbdragon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Mar 2007 23:03:37 -0700
Maverick wrote:
Dr. zara wrote:
I guess Gates really does own apple.
http://www.macworld.co.uk/macsoftware/news/index.cfm?newsid=17581
A report this morning claims Apple will be forced to delay the release of
Mac OS X 10.5 'Leopard' in order to deliver Vista compatibility in the OS's
Boot Camp software.
The report has been reported as a rumour, but one never knows.
So it looks like M$ again can't deliver good documentation on their APIs
and probably won't cooperate with Apple on obtaining a level of
compatitbility.
It is as I have figured... M$ doesn't want users to get a side by side
comparison of Vista vs OS X. Then the real truth will get out and ruin
M$ reputation.
Since when does a bootloader need any API information? I'm not sure
if Boot Camp uses chain loading, but I haven't seen any documentation
on that either. I have loaded Vista, Windows XP, Darwin BSD, OS X,
Linux, and FreeBSD - all on the same computer, all independent of each
other (except /home, /var, /ind). I have no trouble, but then again I
use GRUB. And filesystem drivers for Windows, but that is in no way
related to Boot Camp.
--
Al Phi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Leopard delayed
- From: Maverick
- Re: Leopard delayed
- From: Steve de Mena
- Re: Leopard delayed
- References:
- Leopard delayed
- From: Dr. zara
- Re: Leopard delayed
- From: Maverick
- Leopard delayed
- Prev by Date: Re: New Mac Ad
- Next by Date: Re: Strange PC networking problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Leopard delayed
- Next by thread: Re: Leopard delayed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
