Re: OT: Steve Carroll's still a Douche Bag (in case you missed it)
- From: Sandman <mr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:12:45 +0100
In article <C225B8F6.7B2E1%SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Snit <SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Fine. You're entitled to your opinion. Now explain how you're any
different if you flame him?
I have explained the differences to you: Jesus is *responding* to Steve's
trolling.
No, he started a thread about Steve Carroll. It's the thread you're
currently writing in. Jesus has realised this and agreed with my
conclusion. Who are you arguing with?
--
Sandman[.net]
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- OT: Steve Carroll's still a Douche Bag (in case you missed it)
- From: Jesus
- Re: OT: Steve Carroll's still a Douche Bag (in case you missed it)
- From: Sandman
- Re: OT: Steve Carroll's still a Douche Bag (in case you missed it)
- From: Jesus
- Re: OT: Steve Carroll's still a Douche Bag (in case you missed it)
- From: Sandman
- Re: OT: Steve Carroll's still a Douche Bag (in case you missed it)
- From: Snit
- OT: Steve Carroll's still a Douche Bag (in case you missed it)
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Steve Carroll's still a Douche Bag (in case you missed it)
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Steve Carroll's still a Douche Bag (in case you missed it)
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Steve Carroll's still a Douche Bag (in case you missed it)
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Steve Carroll's still a Douche Bag (in case you missed it)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|