Re: OT: Steve Carroll's still a Douche Bag (in case you missed it)
- From: Sandman <mr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:26:24 +0100
In article <1174426894.194052.130570@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Jesus" <rustybucket666@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Suck it, fucker.
So, let me get this straight - Steve Carroll is a "douche bag" because
- I'm assuming - he is "obsessed" with Snit and one of the things you
base it on are the threads, about Snit, that he has posted?
So in order to communicate this feeling, you start a lot of threads...
About Steve Carroll? Ironic, to say the least. :)
Steve Carroll is a douche bag because he keeps flaming Snit and won't
answer my questions about why.
Fine. You're entitled to your opinion. Now explain how you're any
different if you flame him?
He just calls me Snit's sock puppet.
I'm not defending Steve at all, but as far as I can see - Snit is the
one that called you someone's sock puppet, namely Steves.
I have yet to get Steve to answer one of my questions - he either
ignores what I said or answers some other question and not the one I
asked.
Fine. So stop asking and let it be. If you can't make any progress,
why start multiple threads just to flame him?
He also reposts the same material over and over, apparently
expecting something new to happen
I can think of at least one other poster in csma that does something
very much like that. :-D
I haven't even been in this group that long and I've seen Steve post
the same *** repeatedly. At least Snit gives some appearance of
wanting to stop the arguments with Steve.
I thought so too, but the second I lifted my killfile, Snit didn't
seem to wait for long before dragging up old ***.
The new threads were just to mock his new ShitPost series (which, once
again, was a repeat of the usual ShitPost series). Also, I hardly
call two posts "a lot"... certainly pales in comparison to the number
of repeat posts Steve has created.
Fair enough, I just wanted to let you know that to the audience
outside of you and Steve, you wouldn't come off as any better if you
use the same tactics, so to speak.
--
Sandman[.net]
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: The best Mac Advocate's ideas about being "honest and honorable" - part 3
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Steve Carroll's still a Douche Bag (in case you missed it)
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Steve Carroll's still a Douche Bag (in case you missed it)
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Steve Carroll's still a Douche Bag (in case you missed it)
- Index(es):