Re: OT: Steve Carroll's still a Douche Bag (in case you missed it)

On Mar 20, 4:46 am, Sandman <m...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1174364007.413071.95...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,

"Jesus" <rustybucket...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Suck it, fucker.

So, let me get this straight - Steve Carroll is a "douche bag" because
- I'm assuming - he is "obsessed" with Snit and one of the things you
base it on are the threads, about Snit, that he has posted?

So in order to communicate this feeling, you start a lot of threads...
About Steve Carroll? Ironic, to say the least. :)

--
Sandman[.net]

Steve Carroll is a douche bag because he keeps flaming Snit and won't
answer my questions about why. He just calls me Snit's sock puppet.
I have yet to get Steve to answer one of my questions - he either
ignores what I said or answers some other question and not the one I
asked. He also reposts the same material over and over, apparently
expecting something new to happen (or he just likes seeing the same
explosions happen over and over). I haven't even been in this group
that long and I've seen Steve post the same *** repeatedly. At least
Snit gives some appearance of wanting to stop the arguments with
Steve.

The new threads were just to mock his new ShitPost series (which, once
again, was a repeat of the usual ShitPost series). Also, I hardly
call two posts "a lot"... certainly pales in comparison to the number
of repeat posts Steve has created.

.