Re: PC: Install more RAM, boot slower - why?
- From: Anthony Minkoff <adminkoff@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 21:48:16 -0700
In article <no-9B41F6.19514608092006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Mike <no@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sorry, but this "question" has all the markings of a troll.
Man, are you paranoid. Why would a troll make up something as trivial
as an extra 20 seconds of boot time -- and in the same post mention
noticeably decreased swapping, a benefit which obviously outweighs the
extra boot time?
It has all the markings of a mildly curious user to me.
If he was genuinely concerned - why post here?
Because he's a regular user of this newsgroup. It seems like mild
curiosity, and it wasn't worth subscribing to another newsgroup about
it. That's my guess. But he should speak for himself, if he's even
following this thread after your idiotic comments.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PC: Install more RAM, boot slower - why?
- From: John Slade
- Re: PC: Install more RAM, boot slower - why?
- References:
- PC: Install more RAM, boot slower - why?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: PC: Install more RAM, boot slower - why?
- From: Mike
- Re: PC: Install more RAM, boot slower - why?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: PC: Install more RAM, boot slower - why?
- From: Mike
- Re: PC: Install more RAM, boot slower - why?
- From: Dave Fritzinger
- Re: PC: Install more RAM, boot slower - why?
- From: Mike
- PC: Install more RAM, boot slower - why?
- Prev by Date: Re: The Cube not dead? Maybe..
- Next by Date: Re: Reality check for Vista
- Previous by thread: Re: PC: Install more RAM, boot slower - why?
- Next by thread: Re: PC: Install more RAM, boot slower - why?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|