Re: Apple + Sun ?



In article
<gmgraves-F98834.13022230082006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
George Graves <gmgraves@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <mr-DC7AFC.21194830082006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Sandman <mr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <jpolaski-1908D6.13582330082006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Jim Polaski <jpolaski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

yeah, this is from our loved InterNut, John Dvorak at MarketWatch.

Regardless, does it make any sense?

http://tinyurl.com/kbwvd

A merger? No... why? It's not like Sun has lots of stuff Apple would
want... And if they did, why not just buy Sun?

With AMD buying ATI, purchasing Nvidia might be a better deal for
Apple. Having the "other" chip maker closely to yourself might help
Apple getting more attention from game developers, attracting a larger
consumer portion.

I don't disagree with that. I just don't see what today's Sun has to
bring to the party.

Exactly.


--
Sandman[.net]
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Apple + Sun ?
    ... Regardless, ... A merger? ... It's not like Sun has lots of stuff Apple would ... why not just buy Sun? ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Apple + Sun ?
    ... Regardless, ... A merger? ... It's not like Sun has lots of stuff Apple would ... why not just buy Sun? ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Apple + Sun ?
    ... Regardless, ... A merger? ... It's not like Sun has lots of stuff Apple would want... ... purchasing Nvidia might be a better deal for Apple. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Apple + Sun ?
    ... Regardless, ... A merger? ... It's not like Sun has lots of stuff Apple would want... ... purchasing Nvidia might be a better deal for Apple. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Apple + Sun ?
    ... Regardless, ... A merger? ... It's not like Sun has lots of stuff Apple would ... why not just buy Sun? ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)