Re: MS leaks Vista pricing.
- From: Derek Currie <derekcurrie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 04:09:49 GMT
In article <ed2a5g$u7c$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
nospam <nospamatall@xxxxxx> wrote:
tom_elam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hmm, first update I've paid for in 6 years vs. how many OS X paid
updates? I could go with the $269 option, but I'll get it free
through the University. I would have to pay for OS X updates, so the
cost ratio of Apple to Microsoft for me is infinity.
Sorry, no argument here, MS wins hands down.
you get what you pay for.
Tom, as usual, makes an ass of himself. And, as usual, Mac OS X is
CHEAPER than Windows, for everyone but Tom, if you take into account ALL
costs.
Go read my post 'Windows 5x More Expensive than Mac OS X' AND also READ
THE ARTICLE that is linked in it.
Then cry and cry like your heart is breaking, poor sad Windows users.
:-P
--
Fortune Magazine, 11-29-05: What's your computer setup today?
Frederick Brooks: I happily use a Macintosh. It's not been equalled for ease
of use, and I want my computer to be a tool, not a challenge.
<http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2005/12/12/8363107/>
[Frederick Brooks is the author of 'The Mythical Man Month'. He spearheaded
the movement to modernize computer software engineering in 1975]
.
- References:
- MS leaks Vista pricing.
- From: Jim Polaski
- Re: MS leaks Vista pricing.
- From: Jim Lee Jr.
- Re: MS leaks Vista pricing.
- From: tom_elam
- Re: MS leaks Vista pricing.
- From: nospam
- MS leaks Vista pricing.
- Prev by Date: Re: Own your own nuke... Snit says it's OK!!!
- Next by Date: Re: Where WILL Steve Jobs go wrong
- Previous by thread: Re: MS leaks Vista pricing.
- Next by thread: Re: MS leaks Vista pricing.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
