Re: Agent 4.0 Well Worth The $15
- From: Donald L McDaniel <orthocross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:37:26 -0700
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 09:23:10 +0200, Sandman <mr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <v102f21i87k9o4k8ovi5u9o50opd9k6vip@xxxxxxx>,
Donald L McDaniel <orthocross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Don't you like the threading display? I think it's really rather good.
I just cannot explain this to someone who quite possibly has never
used Windows before. If you had seen Windows newsreaders in action,a
and seen their superior threading abilities, you would understand what
I mean.
Please. You're posting with Agent, which is the worst usenet known to
mankind, after outlook.
Sandman, I'm sorry to inform you, but Microsoft Outlook for Windows
does not have an internal Usenet client. It normally launches
Microsoft Outlook Express (no relationship to Microsoft Outlook, by
the way) as a child process when one clicks on "Go->News" from the
Menu.
Otherwise, it launches the default Windows Newsreader (whatever that
is) as a child process.
I see you've managed to "kid yourself" pretty well, yourself.
While we're at the job of EDUCATING your ignorance, let's talk about
Microsoft "Outlook Express", for a moment.
1) Microsoft Outlook Express is NOT a "cut down" version of Microsoft
Office Office Outlook, Microsoft's PIM.
2) Microsoft Outlook Express has NONE of Microsoft Office Outlook's
code.
3) Microsoft Outlook Express is the successor to "Microsoft Internet
Mail and News" (which is why it's executable is called "msimn.exe",
not "outlook.exe", which is the executable for Microsoft Office
Outlook).
4) Microsoft Office Outlook is a PIM which contains an email client,
but NO Usenet abilities in Internet mode (although it WILL download
Usenet messages when connected to a Microsoft Exchange Server). In
any case, Microsoft Office Outlook has no native Usenet client at all.
5) Microsoft Windows Mail is the successor to Microsoft Outlook
Express, and contains much of it's code.
==
Donald L. McDaniel
Please reply to the original thread.
==========================================================
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Agent 4.0 Well Worth The $15
- From: Sandman
- Re: Agent 4.0 Well Worth The $15
- References:
- Agent 4.0 Well Worth The $15
- From: Mayor of R'lyeh
- Re: Agent 4.0 Well Worth The $15
- From: Sandman
- Re: Agent 4.0 Well Worth The $15
- From: Steve de Mena
- Re: Agent 4.0 Well Worth The $15
- From: Patrick Nihill
- Re: Agent 4.0 Well Worth The $15
- From: Donald L McDaniel
- Re: Agent 4.0 Well Worth The $15
- From: Peter Hayes
- Re: Agent 4.0 Well Worth The $15
- From: Donald L McDaniel
- Re: Agent 4.0 Well Worth The $15
- From: Sandman
- Agent 4.0 Well Worth The $15
- Prev by Date: Re: OT serious question
- Next by Date: Re: New TV ads tout Macs lack of Viruses.
- Previous by thread: Re: Agent 4.0 Well Worth The $15
- Next by thread: Re: Agent 4.0 Well Worth The $15
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading