Re: ZnU's New Out

On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:25:40 -0400, ZnU <znu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <ekbmd2h6uc7qvckob5rks2kj6r1m85vtkg@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 23:06:36 -0400, ZnU <znu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <evvkd25og6jklhelsc22cdvthbj86jis19@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:12:33 -0400, ZnU <znu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <tgpkd2hiod2ucu32uivtem8u3b4q7tmjmp@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 02:05:48 -0400, ZnU <znu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <gu1id2tcj8j2gae5jprt5e36qg7fdpmsdu@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 02:12:29 -0400, ZnU <znu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <aaagd219a9mi4cfunkiln0d5trfto9sunv@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 02:00:02 -0400, ZnU <znu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> chose
to
bless us with the following wisdom:

In article <5f9gd2th1h0p4ss8tpalpteboconb9sqmk@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:50:34 -0400, ZnU <znu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
chose
to
bless us with the following wisdom:

In article <znu-7B2D57.00461308082006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
ZnU <znu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <3t3gd257od8njo86t8cpfssnaec6t1nrhi@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From now on ZnU will declare any item found by searching
with
Google to be 'right wing propaganda' and thus null and
void
as
far as he's concerned, facts be damned. I just thought
you
should know. 8)

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/08/07/D8JBTSFG0.html

Google has, as nearly as anyone can tell, been pretty good
about
not allowing their commercial relationships to influence
their
search results. I have confidence they'll continue to
follow
that
policy.

Oh, and just in case anyone was even considering taking any
of
Mayor's sources seriously... one of his favorites is
WordNetDaily,
which apparently now has pyramid conspiracy believers on
staff:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50704

Well, I suppose it makes sense. Holding the political views
the
folks there hold does require one to have, shall we say,
fragile
ties to reality.

They're peddling a book. Its an ad.

So, you're saying they run ads that look like news articles? So,
how
do
I know exactly which articles are ads and which are news?

The ads are obviously trying to sell you something. If you really
couldn't tell that was an ad then you shouldn't be in charge of
your
own affairs.

As nearly as I can tell, the entire site is designed to sell me an
irrational political ideology.

Actully most ofit is just reprints from AP and such. And its only
irrational to a radical Christian hating communist.

So why do I, as a modern social democrat, find it irrational?

A Social Democrat is a communist who realizes that the word communist
has a great many negative connotations.

Nope. All done here.

[snip]

You're going to have to explain that.

No, not really. There's no point in discussing politics with you, Mayor.
You've bought into a radical orthodoxy at such a deep level, you aren't
even capable of rationally considering the views of others. I might as
well argue religion with a member of a militant Muslim sect.

The irony is that it is you who is like that.

Sorry, no. Do I constantly call you a Nazi, the way you constantly call
me a Communist?

I call you a communist for one simple reason - you're always pushing
communist ideas and philosophy. Whatever else I may do I do not push
Nazi ideas and philosophy.

Do I link pretty much exclusively to "news" sources
which either have open ideological agendas or are controlled by special
interest groups?

Yes.

Do I repeat the same talking points over and over
again, completely ignoring large amounts of hard scientific data to the
contrary?

Yes. You routinely dismiss anything that doesn't agree with your
worldview, no matter the source.

Do I accuse the people I'm arguing with of deliberately trying
to destroy society,

I only do that for people who are, in fact, pushing idea that would
destroy society.

and of having no moral system at all?

I've made my argument on that topic. You can disagree with it but you
can't honestly say its a baseless charge.


[snip]
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: ZnUs New Out
    ... bless us with the following wisdom: ... Google to be 'right wing propaganda' and thus null and void ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: ZnUs New Out
    ... bless us with the following wisdom: ... Google has, as nearly as anyone can tell, been pretty good about ... you're saying they run ads that look like news articles? ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Google CEO Joins Apples Board
    ... chose to bless us with the following wisdom: ... and so today, the CEO of Google, Dr. Eric Schmidt joins Apple's ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: ZnUs New Out
    ... bless us with the following wisdom: ... Google to be 'right wing propaganda' and thus null and void ... you're saying they run ads that look like news articles? ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: How the Pro Shooters look at Aperture.
    ... >> chose to bless us with the following wisdom: ... >>>supplied the photography, and I have seen the ads, that's all. ... And no one bothered to name these magazines? ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)