Re: MS's Vista majorly embarrassed in Public!

On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 20:45:57 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@xxxxxxxxx>
chose to bless us with the following wisdom:

In article <9rb7d21lbp2b8l9d1ks7gcj6slrlptl7ig@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:31:29 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@xxxxxxxxx>
chose to bless us with the following wisdom:

In article <earqc2lojbossh3fbricp6pol7ic7gggr3@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 02:35:28 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

In article <r5qqc294bqjbmc6jfsoftj9a16ql2fhmr9@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 02:18:15 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

In article <54pqc29vhiq3hguji05hkk9k5cvrf4upp6@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 16:56:20 -0600, Oxford <colalovesosx@xxxxxxx>
wrote:

This one will go into the record books for illustrating just how
poorly
Vista is working. This major goof was in front of investors and the
media no less! More news on this tomorrow!

No wonder it won't ship for awhile, it's a MESS!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fV1kqthZf2g

LOL! How steamed are you going to be when it sells more on its first
day of release

When do you predict that will be?

It doesn't matter.

Right. Duck the question.

Not giving you the answer that you want is not ducking the question.

But not giving an answer at all certainly is.

The answer I gave you is above for anyone interested to see. That you
don't like it, or more likely, don't understand it doesn't mean that
you didn't get one.

What means I didn't get an answer is the fact that you didn't provide
one.

You're getting senile in your old age. Back in your prime you would
have trimmed out the answer I gave you when you claimed I didn't give
you one. Instead you've left in - twice, no less.




The best part is that we have a long thread where
Maccies are wailing that a website hosted on an OS X machine being
compromised says nothing about MacOS X and a thread declaring that

Because it *did* say nothing about Mac OS X.

Wait for it...


Vista is bad because an app running on it screwed up. Could the Maccie
double standard be better illustrated?

Is that an app running on Vista? Or is it a service that you're supposed
to be able to use in any application. Because if it's the former, it's
truly lame.

...LOL! You just can't give up your double standard can you?

I have displayed no double standard.

LOL! You have more double standards than everyone else I've come
across put together.

Someone used an application not even supplied by Apple

So all of the bragging about Apache being on the MacOS X CD was a lie
then?

Apache wasn't what failed. See if you can find the facts.

Here's a fact for you - For years Maccies hooted that to have a secure
webserver all one needed was to run it on a Mac. It looks like that
meme went down in flames.



and that application had flaws versus a major new
feature of Vista -- which it turns out most definitely *is* a part of
the OS -- screwed up in front of hundreds of people.

So all of the Maccies' braying about the OS actually just being the
kernel and everything else was just apps layered on top in an attempt
to disprove that it was even possible for Microsoft to integrate IE
into the OS were just lies?

How do you make that rather incredible leap. And it is a huge
non-sequitur.

It shows that to Maccies the definition of 'OS' is flexible and can be
shaped however they need it to be to fit their arguments.


A bit late, but thanks for the confession.


[Insert all of your whiny excuses and declarations of 'its totally
different when it happens on MacOS X' here.]

Nothing happened to Mac OS X, so I don't see why I'd say anything here.

Especially when you posted it above.




than MacOS X has in its lifetime?
--
"We believe Internet Explorer is a really good browser.
Internet Explorer is my browser of choice."

Steve Jobs
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: MSs Vista majorly embarrassed in Public!
    ... Because it *did* say nothing about Mac OS X. ... Is that an app running on Vista? ... You just can't give up your double standard can you? ... Here's a fact for you - For years Maccies hooted that to have a secure ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: MSs Vista majorly embarrassed in Public!
    ... chose to bless us with the following wisdom: ... You just can't give up your double standard can you? ... Here's a fact for you - For years Maccies hooted that to have a secure ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: MSs Vista majorly embarrassed in Public!
    ... Maccies are wailing that a website hosted on an OS X machine being ... Vista is bad because an app running on it screwed up. ... the Wintroll double standard certainly couldn't be better ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Shame on you
    ... chose to bless us with the following wisdom: ... Tryng to link Maccies and mass killers is really beyond the pale. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Shame on you
    ... chose to bless us with the following wisdom: ... Not Mac users, Maccies. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
Loading