Re: MS's Vista majorly embarrassed in Public!

In article <earqc2lojbossh3fbricp6pol7ic7gggr3@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 02:35:28 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

In article <r5qqc294bqjbmc6jfsoftj9a16ql2fhmr9@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 02:18:15 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

In article <54pqc29vhiq3hguji05hkk9k5cvrf4upp6@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 16:56:20 -0600, Oxford <colalovesosx@xxxxxxx>
wrote:

This one will go into the record books for illustrating just how
poorly
Vista is working. This major goof was in front of investors and the
media no less! More news on this tomorrow!

No wonder it won't ship for awhile, it's a MESS!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fV1kqthZf2g

LOL! How steamed are you going to be when it sells more on its first
day of release

When do you predict that will be?

It doesn't matter.

Right. Duck the question.

Not giving you the answer that you want is not ducking the question.

But not giving an answer at all certainly is.


The best part is that we have a long thread where
Maccies are wailing that a website hosted on an OS X machine being
compromised says nothing about MacOS X and a thread declaring that

Because it *did* say nothing about Mac OS X.

Wait for it...


Vista is bad because an app running on it screwed up. Could the Maccie
double standard be better illustrated?

Is that an app running on Vista? Or is it a service that you're supposed
to be able to use in any application. Because if it's the former, it's
truly lame.

...LOL! You just can't give up your double standard can you?

I have displayed no double standard. Someone used an application not
even supplied by Apple and that application had flaws versus a major new
feature of Vista -- which it turns out most definitely *is* a part of
the OS -- screwed up in front of hundreds of people.


[Insert all of your whiny excuses and declarations of 'its totally
different when it happens on MacOS X' here.]

Nothing happened to Mac OS X, so I don't see why I'd say anything here.

Especially when you posted it above.




than MacOS X has in its lifetime?

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: MSs Vista majorly embarrassed in Public!
    ... Is that an app running on Vista? ... You just can't give up your double standard can you? ... So all of the bragging about Apache being on the MacOS X CD was a lie ... "If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Can Vista be "locked down" ?
    ... supplied by Vista. ... "Administrators group-Members of this group run as standard ... they require access to an administrator password to do ... instead of IE - it's much more secure. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.vista.general)
  • Re: Office 2003 Setup cannot continue because the installation source has been corrupted
    ... I've installed Vista on another PC and don't like it. ... The problems with Office 2003 Standard addition are: ... MS in their infinite wisdom removed the Outlook vertical button/shortcut ... I need the Outlook shortcut bar, the folder view, the list view and ...
    (microsoft.public.office.setup)
  • Re: MSs Vista majorly embarrassed in Public!
    ... chose to bless us with the following wisdom: ... Is that an app running on Vista? ... You just can't give up your double standard can you? ... Here's a fact for you - For years Maccies hooted that to have a secure ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
Loading