Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- From: Sandman <mr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 10:47:59 +0200
In article <C0D60D00.548E2%SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Snit <SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I will grant that Dreamweaver lacks many of those things
All.
at least that I
know of. Do you use them all?
Obviously.
Even if you use a good number of those or any given key one, then
Dreamweaver, alone, would not serve your purposes and that would be
a reason it would not work for you.
No ***, Sherlock.
Why did you drag your feet so horribly to mention those things?
Because you wouldn't understand them - as you have just shown. They
went over your head.
--
Sandman[.net]
.
- References:
- Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- From: Tim Adams
- Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- From: Wally
- Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- From: Timberwoof
- Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- From: Wally
- Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- From: Timberwoof
- Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- From: Sandman
- Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- From: Sandman
- Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- From: Sandman
- Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- From: Sandman
- Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- From: Sandman
- Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- From: Sandman
- Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- From: Sandman
- Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- Prev by Date: Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- Next by Date: Re: I Succumb
- Previous by thread: Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- Next by thread: Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- Index(es):
Loading