Re: Apple Ad debate

In article <C0D3D3A9.54692%SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Snit <SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hehe, Michael thinks that Googles usenet indexing is the same as
indexing of web pages. Hilarious. You're on a holy "Prove That Snit Is
Ignorant About Google, Dreamweaver and the Internet" crusade. :-D

You claimed that your site is not linked from any other web page.

I showed you how to find over 250 web pages that *do* link to your site.

Any questions?

This is a semantic diversion, and part of your trolling game. Google
probably doesn't index csma.sandman.net because no other web page is
linked to it. Instead of trying to argue that csma.sandman.net IS
indexed (which is your argument) you want to prove the claim "no other
web page is linked to it" wrong as a diversion.

Problem is, Google doesn't follow web links from its usenet indexing
and index them in its web indexing, since if they did,
csma.sandman.net would be indexed.


Snit Objective Troll Criteria Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1 [ ] Obfuscation
2 [ ] Antagonizing threads
3 [ ] Ignoring evidence
4 [ ] Antagonizing through other media
5 [ ] Quote-scavanging
6 [ ] Thread hijacking
7 [ ] Projection
8 [ ] Unsubstantiated accusations
9 [ ] Unsubstantiated "refutations"
10 [ ] Forging posts and material
11 [ ] Insults
12 [ ] Role Reversal
13 [ ] Lying
14 [ ] Having an agenda
15 [X] Diversion
----------------------------------------------------------------------



15. Diversion
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When the troll gets tangled up in his lies and obfuscation in a way
where there is no way to move his argument further, he will create a
diversion. This is also where the trolls agenda [1] is mostly shown
and the troll will begin talking about other issues he or she is
having in order to divert away from the current failure.

And example is this [2], when Michael all of a sudden brings up a
totally unrelated issue regarding a specific quote Steve has been
posting in an issue that deals with whether Steve had commented on
dreamweaver. Note how he claims to have moved the goalpost "back"
while introducing a totally unrelated issue.

1:<http://csma.sandman.net/texter/read.php?id=102889>
2:<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/4111bc3c408
a9354>


----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Objective Troll Criteria
http://csma.sandman.net/TrollCriteria
----------------------------------------------------------------------



--
Sandman[.net]
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Indexing of Blog in Google
    ... I heared Google is almost indexing blogger weekly. ... And let's consider the fact that crawling power ... indexing in search engines, but they at least createtemporary inbound links ...
    (alt.internet.search-engines)
  • Re: Search finds matching filenames but not files with matching content
    ... "system drive" was activated for indexing. ... I'll check out Google and Yahoo. ... try a free third party tool for this, such as google desktop search or ... yahoo desktop search; there are others too, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • RE: Log Question
    ... It looks like it is trying to exploit a buffer overflow in the Indexing ... do a search for null.ida on google for more information. ... of signature. ...
    (Focus-Microsoft)
  • Re: Google has removed my site from their index - why and what do I do?
    ... searching from Google were not coming to the site). ... I believe that frames are worthwhile. ... Next indexing date? ... I suspect that Google may have recently determined that your ...
    (alt.internet.search-engines)