Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- From: Wally <wally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 15:08:49 GMT
On 5/7/06 9:26 PM, in article C0D10C28.54148%SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"Snit" <SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Wally" <wally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
C0D1A0DA.C77E%wally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 7/5/06 2:01 AM:
On 5/7/06 12:04 PM, in article C0D0886F.540ED%SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"Snit" <SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Alrigthty... another debate that has gotten out of hand. Time to put that
one to rest as well.
Hahahahah and what method will Snit employ to do that?
Not by snipping and running as you do! I much prefer to be honest and
honorable than to be a like you; a whiny babbling troll.
Usually Snit can be seen taking what someone has *actually* stated as their
opinion and applying the Snit 'magic dust' to it and then using this
transformed opinion to base his argument around with his fingers crossed of
course hoping that it won't be spotted!
Ah, you started with some unsupported accusations. Not uncommon for the
comedy routines of you, Carroll, Tim, Sandman, etc., but hardly well done.
At least *pretend* like you have support. That is just a hint to help your
comedy routine work better.
I wonder if this will be business as usual for Snit........
1) Is Sandman stating his personal preference and his opinion of wysiwyg
tools in general! no problem so far!
2) Arrrrr! This is where it gets interesting...............
<quote>
"Snit: Dreamweaver is the highest rated *professional* web design tool.
Sandman: And it's still a wysiwyg tool, used mainly by beginners
that doesn't understand the principles of making a web site.
-----
Note: Sandman clearly refers to Dreamweaver as a tool *mainly* for
beginners."
<end quote>
Sandman clearly states his opinion that as a wysiwyg tool it is used mainly
for beginners I imagine he would say the same about any wysiwyg tool!
Except Photoshop is also WYSIWYG.
So what! Sandman was only concerned with web design PS was your strawman!
Snit acknowledges Sandman's opinion and even goes so far as to emphasize
*mainly*! from his (Sandman's) reply.
3) Is where the sprinkling of Snits magic dust occurs.....
<quote>
"Snit: Do you think Photoshop is only for beginners - you know,
like how you claimed Dreamweaver is.
Sandman: Because it is.
-----
Note: Sandman clearly refers to Dreamweaver as a tool *only* for
beginners."
<end quote>
Well firstly Snit lies about what Sandman had actually said and the proof of
that is Snits own acknowledgement of what Sandman had actually said! :-)
"Note: Sandman clearly refers to Dreamweaver as a tool *mainly* for
beginners."-Snit
Remembering that the emphasis on *mainly* was Snits!
So where did Snit get the statement from that had Sandman stating that
anything under discussion at that point was ...
"....a tool *only* for beginners.? Again the emphasis on only is Snit's!
Clearly it was from the statement where Snit himself dishonestly introduced
the word *only* where he had previous acknowledgement that it should
actually read *mainly* if it were to reflect Sandman's stated opinion!
........Snit's magic dust!
But then of course because Snit's lie was not picked up immediately by
Sandman this lie now forms the crux of Snits argument against Sandman.
And you think Sandman responded the way he did because he thought I was not
representing him correctly. Ah. LOL!
Logic dictates that had Sandman noticed that you had dishonestly attributed
a word to him that he did not use namely *only* he would not have agreed to
it! does that surprise you? Surely whilst working toward your alleged degree
in Psychology somewhere along the line you would have learnt how people tend
to react negatively when having words put in their mouths!
As far as it being a "crux", um, Wally, why do you think that one quote is
the crux of my support for my conclusion.
Quite simple you claim that Sandman asserted that Dreamweaver was a tool
*only* for beginners, a claim which never happened a claim that can be seen
clearly arose out of your dishonest manipulation of the truth! as such
it is quite fitting that your entire argument against Sandman be seen in the
same light in short once again you prove that without lies and deceit you
are totally unable to put up any reasoned argument!
* Conclusion: ......
Sandman was able to conduct himself in an honest manner by stating an honest
opinion and so you tried to ridicule that opinion by dishonestly
misrepresenting it!...........yup business as usual for you Snit!
--
"Would eating a banana or sniffing a flower make it all go away?" -Snit
.
- References:
- Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- From: Wally
- Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- Prev by Date: Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- Next by Date: Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- Previous by thread: Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- Next by thread: Re: Dreamweaver Debate
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
