Re: Al Gore Gets Global Warming Science Right According To Experts




Mayor of R'lyeh wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 22:38:59 -0400, ZnU <znu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> chose to
bless us with the following wisdom:

In article
<gmgraves-6EAF2F.00360528062006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
George Graves <gmgraves@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <pan.2006.06.28.03.20.23.556980@xxxxxxxx>,
TheLetterK <non@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 02:40:52 +0000, Warchild wrote:

In article <ks2dnVCl0Z7bfTzZnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"John" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/06/27/gore.science.ap/index.html

Al Gore is not relaying a theory that he whipped up on his own. The
theory on the origin of global warming have been around for the past
fifty years.

More like 30-40. 50 years ago, they were more worried about global cooling.

The difference now is that we are now actually being
impacted by the consequences of global warming, and that even if we act
now, we will still be suffering for many decades to come. If we fail to
act, we will be suffering much worse.

The problem is that no one has a workable plan for doing anything useful.

That's because there is NO useful plan and even if there were one, it
would take decades to put into effect. The world simply cannot just stop
producing CO2. There is no technology or, indeed, set of technologies,
on earth that could be implemented quickly enough or thoroughly enough
to counter global warming IF it is caused by human activity. And if it's
not caused by human activity, there's nothing we can do but ride it out.

Nuclear power. It's reasonably cheap, we know how to do it, and unlike
solar or wind, it can be scaled up pretty much as far as you'd like.

And thanks to envirowhackos spreading lies about it 3/4 of the
population thinks a nuclear reactor is an A-bomb in a different form
and wants nothing to do with one.

Er, Mayor... a nuclear reactor *is* an A-bomb in "different form!"
All you need for an atomic explosion is a big enough piece of uranium
to achieve critical mass. The first A-bombs worked by having a piece
of uranium missing from the main mass that was forcibly assembled to it
by a conventional explosive charge.

The main reasons the public has soured on nuclear power are the problem
of disposing of spent fuel, the hazards associated with mining and
storing new fuel, and the serious consequences of an accident at a
nuclear plant.

[snip]

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: realistic aliens and the necessities of storytelling
    ... result in massive reductions in CO2 emissions, ... if regulatory obstacles to nuclear power are ... about anthropogenic global warming) then coal will ... a global carbon tax and global ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Re: McCain-Lieberman nuclear power grab
    ... we learned that landmark global warming legislation is ... in danger of being hijacked by Senator John McCain. ... Senator McCain started making it known that he would ... Tell your senator: Oppose the McCain-Lieberman nuclear power grab.http://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=519&id=287-87382-OmWzz1&t=24 ...
    (alt.home.repair)
  • Re: What great lines...
    ... If these people who keep saying there is global warming actually ... they would be 100% behind nuclear power. ... no green house gases from a nuclear power plant. ... made global warrming, I will accept it for what it is, politics. ...
    (rec.boats)
  • Re: Former Anti-Nuclear Activist Does A 180
    ... to the number of death due to nuclear power, ... Extracting the CO2 from power staion exhaust gases ... But I do not think CO2 causes global warming, ... The fact that Gore is selling global warming doesn't say anything ...
    (sci.electronics.design)