Re: Firewire dead? Not at all.
- From: Steve Hix <sehix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:19:28 -0700
In article <1hhr7yu.1seyr9opj09djN%peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Bjørn Perlsø) wrote:
Chris Clement <chris.clement@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Actually, USB2 is daisy chainable. Or did you mean FW was *more* daisy
chainable?
I have yet to see a videocorder or a hard drive that had more than 1 USB
prot (to allow daisy chaining to other devices).
Every FireWire unit I've ever come across, besides the iSIght cam, has
had more than one FireWire port, either FW400 or FW800 (newer LaCie hard
drives).
Video cameras with FireWire (more often iLink equivalent) tend to be set
up a the terminal node in a FireWire chain.
.
- References:
- Firewire dead? Not at all.
- From: Jim Polaski
- Re: Firewire dead? Not at all.
- From: Craig Koller
- Re: Firewire dead? Not at all.
- From: Chris Clement
- Re: Firewire dead? Not at all.
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Firewire dead? Not at all.
- Prev by Date: Re: Some virus education for edwin
- Previous by thread: Re: Firewire dead? Not at all.
- Next by thread: Re: Firewire dead? Not at all.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
