Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- From: ZnU <znu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:29:29 -0400
In article <0001HW.C0C9FF4000041E28F0284530@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Tim Murray <no-spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 29, 2006, Mayor of R'lyeh wrote:
You can easily tell the difference between Paint and Photoshop
Elements in both formats. I've done it.
There will be a difference between JPEG and, say, BMP or TIFF, but
not between the same format between Paint and Photoshop or anything
else.
With JPEG, some programs *will* produce better output than others.
If you think you are really seeing something different (same format
diff app), it may be a profile attached to data, but they are indeed
the same image.
--
"Those who enter the country illegally violate the law."
-- George W. Bush in Tucson, Ariz., Nov. 28, 2005
.
- References:
- XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- From: George Graves
- Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- From: Mayor of R'lyeh
- Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- From: Mayor of R'lyeh
- Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- From: Mayor of R'lyeh
- Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- From: Tim Murray
- XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- Prev by Date: Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- Next by Date: Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- Previous by thread: Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- Next by thread: Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
