Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive

Josh McKee wrote:
In article <1151617479.191328.226080@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Edwin" <thorne25@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

George Graves wrote:
After a week of using XP Pro at my newest client's place of
business, I have to be honest and say that I was wrong. XP is
nowhere near as unusable as my previous brief encounters with it
had led me to believe. It is, in fact, very usable. [snip of
George's left hand taking away what his right hand just gave us]

Just my two cents and an apology to the Windows users here for many
of my comments about Windows. I still think OSX is MUCH better, but
XP is hardly the garbage that Win98/SE/ME/W2K was or that I thought
XP to still be.

Never mind apologizing for what you said about Windows XP.

How about apologizing for all the insults you gave people for trying
to make you see what you've finally realized about Windows XP?

Bingo! And perhaps he will be a little more open minded when someone
tries to explain something to him in the future.

I think it's hilarious how George calls Windows XP "very usable" in his
thread that labels it as "very primitive."


.

Relevant Pages