Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- From: Sandman <mr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 08:39:51 +0200
In article <7kv8a2ldhldhvqo2np4iebr191sklrooo2@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:55:30 -0700, Snit <SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Mayor of R'lyeh" <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> stated in post
j5q8a2d91i0ilaikt42h0ju26nqte881kq@xxxxxxx on 6/29/06 5:02 PM:
Things like screen capture (needed to write product mamuals) are low
resolution and look terrible compared to those from the Mac.
It gets captured at the resolution of your screen. Please tell me that
you're not pasting them into Paint and saving them there.
Depending on your needs there is nothing wrong with doing that... though it
would be better if XP allowed you to just save directly as the Mac does.
Its been my experience that using Paint as the saving application
produces a degraded image.
It doesn't.
--
Sandman[.net]
.
- References:
- XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- From: George Graves
- Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- From: Mayor of R'lyeh
- Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- From: Mayor of R'lyeh
- XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- Prev by Date: Re: Web Design Facts, final comments? Perhaps.
- Next by Date: Re: Firewire dead? Not at all.
- Previous by thread: Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- Next by thread: Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
