Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- From: "Jim Lee Jr." <peejster01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 01:13:16 -0500
In article <44a4b2d7$0$9913$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"John Slade" <hitman86@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I swear I don't know why they want to keep the Celeron line since
Processors are getting dirt cheap. I mean a full fledged Pentium D 2.66GHz
is around $120 retail. Celerons are about half that with 1/4th the cache.
It's just not worth it. It's a processor made for people who don't know
better. It's been used as a ripp-off for many a fly-by-night PC builder.
John
You misspelled rip-off
.
- References:
- XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- From: George Graves
- Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- From: NRen2k5
- Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- From: John Slade
- XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- Prev by Date: Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- Next by Date: Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- Previous by thread: Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- Next by thread: Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- Index(es):